How could they have left out the patronizing irrelevant [0] links [1] to Wikipedia [2] in all the wannabe-academic [3] comments with references[4]? (and yes, references must be 0-based [5]) [0] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relevance [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_resource_locator [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia [3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academia [4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citation [5…
--
[0] This is meta-meta-contrarianism.
- The layman counts from one
- The uptight programmer counts from zero, because he thinks Dijkstra said so [1].
- The meta-contrarian (which I used to be) says fuck it, ordinals start at one [0].
- The meta-meta-contrarian reads Von Neumann[1], realizes he was formally wrong, and goes one step further in pedanticity, back to zero [0].
[1] http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/EWD/transcriptions/EWD08xx/EW...
[0] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordinal_number_%28linguistics%2...
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordinal_number#Von_Neumann_defi...
[0] Help! I'm trapped in a Boolean algebra[1][0]!
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boolean_algebras_canonically_de....
[0] ... where xor is an addition that wraps around ...
That being said, my brain prefers 1-indexing programming languages like Lua, Julia, R and Matlab...