Live data from Hacker News

What 4chan thinks of HN

rbt.asia

41–50 of 265 posts

Re: What 4chan thinks of HN

#42
I used to participate actively on /g/ in 2007 to 2011 roughly, I go back for a few months at a time. Funny I used to be on so much I could tell who was posting by seeing the frequency of their favorite images to post and what fonts they were using. Their ircs are good too. It's nice to see some of the communities I frequent meet each other.

Re: What 4chan thinks of HN

#43
How could they have left out the patronizing irrelevant [0] links [1] to Wikipedia [2] in all the wannabe-academic [3] comments with references[4]?

(and yes, references must be 0-based [5])

[0] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relevance

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_resource_locator

[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia

[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academia

[4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citation

[5] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-based_numbering

Re: What 4chan thinks of HN

#46
4chan's commenting system is simultaneously more annoying, and more enjoyable to use. The backtrack style lets you follow conversations, but it doesn't become a nested nightmare. Backtracks also highlight comments of importance or significance.

the Reddit/HN system is hunting the most valuable comments through democracy, but it throws that work out because of its visible tree structure. People can ride the top post.

Also the auto updates are nice to stay current on an active conversation.

Gotta give it to 4chan, nice system. Shame about the captcha.

Re: What 4chan thinks of HN

#47

There are a lot people on this forum who seem to think they're absolutely right about some convention or way of life and that they're entitled to attention (ie they believe their take is actually insightful). This describes the "I did or think X, and you should also think or do X" threads.

I think the business of being an entrepreneur selects for such traits. The whole notion of "disruption" that is central to so many of the ideas floating on HN, is rooted in the arrogance necessary to make them work.

It's a shame that such an intelligent group tends towards such arrogance, even in situations where it doesn't help. I think you have a point about the demographic around here being one of the causes of such posts/comments/whatever. However, while the personality traits at fault might have some place in the world of startups--i.e. getting a startup off the ground, against all odds-- it's really too bad that many of us seem to lack to ability to self moderate, even just enough to realize that an arrogant disposition does nothing to further our post about what port we think SSH should run on.
Post reply on HN