Live data from Hacker News

My tmux setup

unwiredcouch.com

81–90 of 101 posts

Re: My tmux setup

#81

tmux is like that thing that you hear about quite often, that you think it's not that useful, but that, once you try, you realize why and where its fame comes from. I adopted tmux about a month ago and I can't really complain much. It's just awesome. If you work a lot in the terminal (I do), I would highly recommend using it.

I did not switch yet. I use screen often, and each time I checked the diff with tmux it seemed to be the same thing with slightly different defaults.

Re: My tmux setup

#82
post #19

I can't recommend Pragmatic Bookshelf's book on tmux enough: http://pragprog.com/book/bhtmux/tmux It's got the whole thing covered end-to-end if you ever wanted to get around learning it.

Author of that book here. Thank you for the kind words.

I just bought a copy. Can't wait to kick screen to the curb.

Re: My tmux setup

#83
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The only thing ctrl-A is used for by me besides screen (or rather, tmux after I remapped it), is incrementing a number in vim. Not really a big deal.

Most people I know use it to go to the beginning of a line in programs that use readline, which includes the shell as well as most programming language interpreters.

I started using screen before I started learning that facility. (At the time, I mostly used Windows, so the Home key was available.)

Of course, when I started developing on a Macbook, screen rapidly became problematic as there was no Home key and I started using Ctrl-A. For the moment, I'm developing locally so I don't need screen or tmux, but I'm working on off-loading to a VM and I'll be using tmux there for the purposes of maintaining my own sanity.

Re: My tmux setup

#84
I've been using screen for years. It works well for me. Can someone list some reasons to switch to tmux? Just about the only thing which annoys me in screen is the awkward switch to "copy mode" to scroll, instead of just hitting PgUp.

Re: My tmux setup

#85
post #19

I can't recommend Pragmatic Bookshelf's book on tmux enough: http://pragprog.com/book/bhtmux/tmux It's got the whole thing covered end-to-end if you ever wanted to get around learning it.

Author of that book here. Thank you for the kind words.

Can you make it cheaper to buy both ebook and the print book? Ideally, I would have hoped that the ebook would come free with purchase of a print book…I would really like to buy both

Re: My tmux setup

#86
post #81

tmux is like that thing that you hear about quite often, that you think it's not that useful, but that, once you try, you realize why and where its fame comes from. I adopted tmux about a month ago and I can't really complain much. It's just awesome. If you work a lot in the terminal (I do), I would highly recommend using it.

I did not switch yet. I use screen often, and each time I checked the diff with tmux it seemed to be the same thing with slightly different defaults.

I use screen quite a lot -- and with xmonad as my main wm, I really don't need many features from screen -- I just have one screen per terminal window.

A friend of mine uses OS X -- and there tmux comes more to it's right as there's no (Free) way to get sane (for biased values of sane) window management under OS X.

[edit: It might be worth noting, that after running into a lot of problems with unicode input and urxvt, I switched to sakura[1] for my terminal -- and it's basically a lighter gnome terminal that's easy to set up without any chrome. Under debian I bind that to my x-terminal-emulator alternative, and I can ctrl-enter to open a new terminal via xmonad (xmonad needs a short config to use x-terminal-emulator though).

[1] http://www.pleyades.net/david/projects/sakura ]

Re: My tmux setup

#90
post #79
post #74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How is p a weird binding? It's a pneumonic for "previous" and works the same as it does in gnu screen, which is tux's "competitor."

> It's a pneumonic for "previous" I'm guessing this is autocorrect, but an autocorrect that knows 'pneumonic' (the Firefox spell-checker doesn't!) but not 'mnemonic' seems even less likely than a person who knows the first word but not the second. Anyway, 'previous' is perhaps less likely to spring to mind than 'back' or 'reverse' or even 'last', each of which would have different mnemonics. ('Last' has a particularl…

previous is unambiguous. Last is extremely ambiguous. Last = Nth element or current -1? Similar with back or reverse. Previous means N-1 every time. Also it's a pretty commonly used programmer idiom.
Post reply on HN