>But the years of using screen have ingrained in my muscle memory to use ctrl-a I still don't understand how this happened to so many people. Ctrl+a is already taken, how did anyone ever use screen without immediately changing it to something that doesn't conflict with a frequently used shell shortcut?
Agreed completely. I used Ctrl-] with screen and just kept that convention with tmux. Ctrl-a is a non-starter for Emacs users, and even neglecting that, there are many contexts where Ctrl-a/Ctrl-e navigation is enabled and useful.
My tmux setup
51–60 of 101 posts
Re: My tmux setup
#52How does that email script work? Here it is: https://github.com/mrtazz/bin/blob/master/imap_check.py This looks for a file at ~/.netrc What is the format of that file? Google results can't find this being used for email anywhere.
Re: My tmux setup
#53Earlier quoted context omitted.
Reader of that book, you finally got me to kick my screen habit with it and now I have a new tmux addiction. That said, tmux is way easier to use compared to screen. And with 1.8 and text reflow it pretty much has every feature from screen I ever wanted/needed/used.
I also love the new zoom pane that comes with 1.8 prefix . It comes very handy!
Re: My tmux setup
#54jnycs: you have been hellbanned for no particular reason.
Re: My tmux setup
#55Earlier quoted context omitted.
Most people I know use it to go to the beginning of a line in programs that use readline, which includes the shell as well as most programming language interpreters.
You can set readline's editing mode to vi so that anything that uses readline will then have vi-style bindings. Very useful, particularly when combined with rlwrap for those few programs that don't have readline support. Zsh doesn't use readline (it has it's own line editor) but it can be set to vi-style input too. (Actually, at least on my system, bash doesn't seem to be linked with libreadline.. I'm not sure if it…
Re: My tmux setup
#56Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because ctrl-a is extremely simple, physically ... for one hand, etc. ctrl-b is fairly quick and easy if you use two hands (which is inferior to using one hand) and is quite a bit more difficult than ctrl-a when using one hand.
You appear to have invented some other post to respond to, mine said nothing about ctrl+b.
Re: My tmux setup
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can set readline's editing mode to vi so that anything that uses readline will then have vi-style bindings. Very useful, particularly when combined with rlwrap for those few programs that don't have readline support. Zsh doesn't use readline (it has it's own line editor) but it can be set to vi-style input too. (Actually, at least on my system, bash doesn't seem to be linked with libreadline.. I'm not sure if it…
Bash uses .inputrc which configures readline, so if it's not actually using libreadline, it's emulating it pretty well.
Re: My tmux setup
#58>But the years of using screen have ingrained in my muscle memory to use ctrl-a I still don't understand how this happened to so many people. Ctrl+a is already taken, how did anyone ever use screen without immediately changing it to something that doesn't conflict with a frequently used shell shortcut?
Re: My tmux setup
#59Earlier quoted context omitted.
Reader of that book, you finally got me to kick my screen habit with it and now I have a new tmux addiction. That said, tmux is way easier to use compared to screen. And with 1.8 and text reflow it pretty much has every feature from screen I ever wanted/needed/used.
I also love the new zoom pane that comes with 1.8 prefix . It comes very handy!
Re: My tmux setup
#60One of things I've been meaning to ask: do people who use tmux mostly run a windows machine as their desktop?