Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Voting Relationships in the US Senate

static.davidchouinard.com

21–30 of 50 posts

Re: Show HN: Voting Relationships in the US Senate

#21
post #10

Is data for pre-90s years available? I am really curious to see the 60-70-80s progression.

My data source (GovTrack) only has vote count, but not roll calls, before the 101th Congress. It might be possible to get data before that, but I suspect it's quite hard.

Re: Show HN: Voting Relationships in the US Senate

#22
post #3

There's probably some cool insights in here, but I'll need some help understanding it. For instance, what does an edge in the graph represent? What can I tell from the boldness of the line? @DavidChoinard can you give us a key?

The thickness of edges represents the number of times the pair of senators voted the same in the Senate (only edges above a threshold are shown). The two tightly coiled clusters shows just how weak the relationships are between the two parties. The closer the nodes are to the center, the more bipartisan those Senators are. In the current Congress, Sens. Murkowski and Collins really stand out as by far the most bipart…

Interesting stuff, thanks for putting it together.

Re: Show HN: Voting Relationships in the US Senate

#23
post #3

There's probably some cool insights in here, but I'll need some help understanding it. For instance, what does an edge in the graph represent? What can I tell from the boldness of the line? @DavidChoinard can you give us a key?

The thickness of edges represents the number of times the pair of senators voted the same in the Senate (only edges above a threshold are shown). The two tightly coiled clusters shows just how weak the relationships are between the two parties. The closer the nodes are to the center, the more bipartisan those Senators are. In the current Congress, Sens. Murkowski and Collins really stand out as by far the most bipart…

The last url looks like some kind of political mitosis. There's probably a joke here related to the genome of government being split into two identical halves…

Re: Show HN: Voting Relationships in the US Senate

#24
post #11

It would be helpful to see an animation to clarify this, but it's interesting to quantify how increasingly polarized this has become, starting in the early '90s.

+1 If the author could get data from 1980-2013, and make it into a 60 second animation, it would be really interesting to see.

I've definitely considered that, but it's computationally difficult to make it in the browser. This animated gif is as close as it comes: http://i.minus.com/ibi7p66VbETpnU.gif

Re: Show HN: Voting Relationships in the US Senate

#28

Nice work David. For anyone interested in this type of analysis, Harvard has a new Data Science course this semester that had this node relationship analysis as a HW using the same data sources. You can check out the course site at: cs109.org

I'm actually a student in the course and my interest in this was spun out of the last homework.

Re: Show HN: Voting Relationships in the US Senate

#29

Nice work David. For anyone interested in this type of analysis, Harvard has a new Data Science course this semester that had this node relationship analysis as a HW using the same data sources. You can check out the course site at: cs109.org

That's a great site, thank's for the link.

Re: Show HN: Voting Relationships in the US Senate

#30
post #3

There's probably some cool insights in here, but I'll need some help understanding it. For instance, what does an edge in the graph represent? What can I tell from the boldness of the line? @DavidChoinard can you give us a key?

The thickness of edges represents the number of times the pair of senators voted the same in the Senate (only edges above a threshold are shown). The two tightly coiled clusters shows just how weak the relationships are between the two parties. The closer the nodes are to the center, the more bipartisan those Senators are. In the current Congress, Sens. Murkowski and Collins really stand out as by far the most bipart…

It probably pays to note that the house and senate were Democratic majorities in 1989, with a Republican president.

I would expect that to create a somewhat different dynamic than the party alignments of today.

Post reply on HN