Live data from Hacker News

The Great Ivy League Nude Posture Photo Scandal (1995)

nytimes.com

31–40 of 75 posts

Re: The Great Ivy League Nude Posture Photo Scandal (1995)

#31
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not even most places in America. This is not obscene in any way, there's just a bit of nudity.

So you'd be fine with co-workers seeing that on your screen?

During lunch time? Yes, I would be absolutely fine.

During working hours: no.

Re: The Great Ivy League Nude Posture Photo Scandal (1995)

#34
post #33
post #32

Not exactly strange. We still employ people to stare at nudes at the new airport scanners after all.

We do not: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/tsa-completely-remo...

I saw and opted out of a full body scanner in August on an international flight at LAX. What gives?

Re: The Great Ivy League Nude Posture Photo Scandal (1995)

#36
post #9

I have a vague feeling of reading this on the new york times website years ago, it was a huge article. Looks like this is a reblogging? Yup, from 1995: http://www.nytimes.com/1995/01/15/magazine/the-great-ivy-lea...

This is the longest "Repost!" comment that I have yet seen.

Re: The Great Ivy League Nude Posture Photo Scandal (1995)

#39

It's interesting how the word "nude" boosts posts to the top of the social hierarchy on HN, Reddit and YouTube, among other sites, even in cases when the content would be otherwise irrelevant or uninteresting to the communities.

At an old job, I once wrote an internal library for working with RDF. Very unsexy stuff, nobody cared. When I changed the name of the library to "Graphic Nudity" (it exposes your graphs!), suddenly a lot of people took notice.

Re: The Great Ivy League Nude Posture Photo Scandal (1995)

#40

This story comes up every now and then; I have a hard time seeing it as a “scandal”. It’s nothing more than a piece of historical anatomical pseudoscience that happens to tickle the salacious fancies of puritan America with the proximity of “nudity” and the names of recognizable celebrities. Might as well be phrenology otherwise.

Taking nude photos of an entire generation of college freshmen (without proper consent) is not scandalous?

Sure, it's not at the level of secret Plutonium injection, but still...

Post reply on HN