(now if you could combine the two...)
Inkjet-Based Circuits at Fraction of Time and Cost
11–20 of 24 posts
Re: Inkjet-Based Circuits at Fraction of Time and Cost
#12The lack of a good gas-tight bond between component and conductor is also problematic: silver tarnishes. Silver-clad switch contacts can be made self-wiping, but not static contacts. Absent some kind of hot-weld method, I can just see SMD parts popping off of flex-circuits.
This is a promising start to a new base-level technology, but it's got a ways to go before it's ready for the R&D lab as a tool rather than a patient. I look forward to seeing these issues overcome.
Re: Inkjet-Based Circuits at Fraction of Time and Cost
#13Lit:
http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2493486
http://www.faqs.org/patents/app/20090233237
Interesting read, but then again I agree that this is a prototype only protocol with little use because of the fragile nature of the circuits.
And as for prototyping, aren't there software suites around that bring sufficient capability in this regard?Re: Inkjet-Based Circuits at Fraction of Time and Cost
#14Re: Inkjet-Based Circuits at Fraction of Time and Cost
#15Re: Inkjet-Based Circuits at Fraction of Time and Cost
#16The ability to print circuits seems even more exciting than 3D printing to me. (now if you could combine the two...)
Re: Inkjet-Based Circuits at Fraction of Time and Cost
#17Re: Inkjet-Based Circuits at Fraction of Time and Cost
#18This is handy for quick prototyping, but it seems that you can't solder on the parts and have to use "conductive double-sided tape or silver epoxy adhesive" instead. To etch a PCB, the typical process is to (1) print a photo mask, (2) transfer it using photolithography or toner transfer, (3) dissolve away the exposed copper, and optionally drill holes. The coolest hack I've seen skips step (1) and (2) by directly "pr…