When Silkroad went down I expected bitcoin to take quite a slump but what has happened is contrary. I am not implying that anonymous transaction s for illegal use are the only thing bitcoins are good for but its my guess that it forms a major part of the group that actually use bitcoins for buying stuff. I am not sure why would anyone would get troubled in buying bitcoins for purchasing rather than punching a CC numb…
Bitcoins reached $300
41–50 of 134 posts
Re: Bitcoins reached $300
#42Thing is, this fluctuations are not connected with any sort of events that make sense or justify the price sky-rocketing which makes me think that the whole thing is driven, manually.
When the whale leaves the sea, BTC will turn into peanuts. Till then...
Re: Bitcoins reached $300
#43Somewhere buried on my hard drive I have a fraction of a bitcoin that people were giving out for free when bitcoin first came out to encourage adoption. I really need to find it, it's actually worth money now... ps. that pizza is now worth $3 Million
Re: Bitcoins reached $300
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
people have suggested mBTC or "millibits". I think it's not something that can be mandated. A new terminology will naturally arise if the need is genuine.
I don't think it'll be needed until/unless bitcoin stablises enough that people start quoting prices in bitcoin. Right now, advertising a computer at 3 bitcoins is not practical. The value of those bitcoins change to fast.
Only if you're seeing the "real" value as the USD. No-one says "$100 is meaningless because its conversion to Thai Baht varies so wildly".
The only thing that will kill bitcoin is stability without utility.
Re: Bitcoins reached $300
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
It was very 'popular' in the 80's and 90's for countries coming out of high inflation. Off the top of my head, Brazil, Peru, Russia, Poland, Yugoslavia, Turkey and Bulgaria all cut three or 4 zeros from their currency to make the numbers easier to handle and to try to mark a psychological end to previous inflation. Zimbabwe did it about once every other year or so back in the mid 2000's.
Mathematically speaking you are talking about dividing but GP talks about multiplying. That I've never heard of too.
Re: Bitcoins reached $300
#46Is there any serious research paper on BTC (and not an enthusiast blog post)?
Re: Bitcoins reached $300
#47Looking at the chart it doesn't seem as volatile as mainstream media leads us to believe.
Re: Bitcoins reached $300
#48where do you personally buy/sell BTC ?
I prefer localbitcoin and bitcoin-otc, but I do have an verified account in MtGox.
I've been waiting more than 24 hours for a BTC withdrawal. It's not even showing up on blockchain.info yet. Search the forums there are a lot of people this is happening to. Some with more than 3 days.
I'd be EXTREMELY cautious and suspicious about Mt.Gox right now. Make very sure you can get your BTC/USD out of Gox before you trust it.
Re: Bitcoins reached $300
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Bitcoins should lose 3 zeros, like many countries do to their currencies. I've never heard of that, although the opposite has been done plenty of times. But that's rarely a sign of a healthy economy, most of the time it's done out of desperation I would think.
It was very 'popular' in the 80's and 90's for countries coming out of high inflation. Off the top of my head, Brazil, Peru, Russia, Poland, Yugoslavia, Turkey and Bulgaria all cut three or 4 zeros from their currency to make the numbers easier to handle and to try to mark a psychological end to previous inflation. Zimbabwe did it about once every other year or so back in the mid 2000's.
Re: Bitcoins reached $300
#50(Rapid deflation is not a great thing for a currency in general)