Few successful entrepreneurs blog
81–90 of 141 posts
Re: Few successful entrepreneurs blog
#82Re: Few successful entrepreneurs blog
#83Re: Few successful entrepreneurs blog
#84Earlier quoted context omitted.
pg blogs? Or are you thinking of his essays?
Same thing. Blogging used to have a different connotation, but it's lost it, and Graham's site fits squarely into the modern notion.
Re: Few successful entrepreneurs blog
#85Still, Wikipedia manages to maintain a not-bad-for-a-first-try quality level on most science-y topics.
Re: Few successful entrepreneurs blog
#86Keith's comment surprised me. I found at least one counterexample among companies we've funded: Jason Freedman of 42Floors. But there are certainly not many.
Re: Few successful entrepreneurs blog
#87This seems like a general trend, and "CEOs and entrepreneurs" are probably just following that general trend.
Re: Few successful entrepreneurs blog
#88Keith's comment surprised me. I found at least one counterexample among companies we've funded: Jason Freedman of 42Floors. But there are certainly not many.
Keith couldn't make up his mind. When Hunter mentioned the CEO of LinkedIn blogs, Keith said it doesn't count because they're not a startup. But by definition, the "unicorn" companies are all more like LI than the average startup. Maybe the question is "at what point does a company cease to be a startup?" At a $1B valuation? Or a significant liquidity event?
Re: Few successful entrepreneurs blog
#89Re: Few successful entrepreneurs blog
#90Keith's comment surprised me. I found at least one counterexample among companies we've funded: Jason Freedman of 42Floors. But there are certainly not many.
What about you, pg? Arguably you are the co-founder of a successful company which takes up most of your time, and you blog. I'm not sure what's the point of this statement. Few successful CEO's blog. Few politicians blog. Few celebrities blog. Few people blog. So what?
There's a hint of at least two tenuous causative implications there: if you're successful, you ought to think twice before wasting time blogging (ie. blogging by the CEO adds no value to the business). Or the corollary: if you're blogging, chances are you're not yet successful (it's a marker for lack of success). Both are reaching.
Blogging by the CEO (founder) simply means that marketing is (also) done by the CEO. The founders and CEOs who don't blog probably delegate marketing activities to specialists (nothing wrong with that). You delegate when you don't possess the skills to execute. This will probably happen when the founders or CEOs don't possess the technical knowledge or expertise about their own fields.