Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Lost & found tags

loseproof.com

41–48 of 48 posts

Re: Show HN: Lost & found tags

#41
post #37

Could I ask about the user testing you did on this? Intuitively, if I lost something valuable, I would feel that people would be more inclined to make an effort in returning it if they saw a name (and hence a person) attached to it. Emotionally, that seems to be more powerful of a draw than a code. I guess in my case, I would think the additional vulnerability from having my name and e-mail address on it would not ou…

I think having a name sounds like a good idea that could be quite hard to do in the wild without making the stickers larger. Take for example my name (Nicholas Smith), which isn't overly long, but it'd take up a bigger chunk of sticker space unless we truncate it to Nick Smith. Which is still reasonably big, so you have to either increase the sticker size or truncate further until it's N.Smith and it loses the persona attached with a name.

Re: Show HN: Lost & found tags

#42
post #31

Or if you could just generate a QR code and print on a sticker saying "if lost, please scan for return details". The QR code takes you to your own website with return details or a mailto: link. Not 100% fool proof and depends on those who find it having a smart phone but its a cheap hack.

I like that idea.

Re: Show HN: Lost & found tags

#44

Now what I would REALLY pay for, and what I thought/hoped was, is stickers had location tracking so I could find them with my phone, i'd put them on my keys, wallet everything. I think THAT, packaged into an very easy service, could be a brilliant business.

I think this is what you're looking for: http://lapa-app.com/

The similarities between Lapa and Tile are scary. Coincidence or copying?

Re: Show HN: Lost & found tags

#45

Now what I would REALLY pay for, and what I thought/hoped was, is stickers had location tracking so I could find them with my phone, i'd put them on my keys, wallet everything. I think THAT, packaged into an very easy service, could be a brilliant business.

Check out https://www.sticknfind.com/

Re: Show HN: Lost & found tags

#46
post #33

Is anyone else's tongue tripping on the name? I keep saying "LooseProof" in an effort to make the syllables use the same vowel sound (English US speaker). The web page is nice, but this stage in my life I feel like I've got too much stuff. Losing it is one convenient way to rid myself of some of the mass. The things I really care about aren't conducive to stickers ... I think my wife and kids would object, but maybe…

I know we're not supposed to comment on being down-voted, but it might be useful to the OP to know why people wouldn't use his product. I don't think I'm alone, but rather that there's a whole demographic of people that feel overwhelmed by what they (now) own.

I don't think I was rude about it ... and doesn't this give the OP a chance to optimize his web-site for people like me? Or at least decide I'm not his target market?

Re: Show HN: Lost & found tags

#47
Your site has several links to "LoseProof store"[1] but I just get redirected to the home page.

Also, I think you should be very explicit about telling people these are stickers. And possibly talk about how well they stick. I don't put stickers on things so these are not for me. I am probably not alone.

Lost & Found seems to be a bit of a crowded space these days... so good luck.

[1] https://loseproof.com/store

Re: Show HN: Lost & found tags

#48
post #33

Is anyone else's tongue tripping on the name? I keep saying "LooseProof" in an effort to make the syllables use the same vowel sound (English US speaker). The web page is nice, but this stage in my life I feel like I've got too much stuff. Losing it is one convenient way to rid myself of some of the mass. The things I really care about aren't conducive to stickers ... I think my wife and kids would object, but maybe…

> Is anyone else's tongue tripping on the name? I keep saying "LooseProof" in an effort to make the syllables use the same vowel sound (English US speaker).

It could be that we pronounce things differently... but for me the single "o" in lose and the double "o" in loose make the same sound as the double "o" in proof. The two words (lose and loose) only differ in the way the "s" sounds. The "s" in lose is more of a "zzzzz" while the "s" in loose is a standard "s" sound. So... my tongue is not tripping on that.

Post reply on HN