I am definitely no security expert, but from my feeling it seems as if unsecure protocol + secure messaging layer is much more successful in practical applications than purely secure protocols. Therefore my believe would be that improving existing secure messaging layers would help the world much more than creating another secure protocol which nobody will use because it would require to replace the whole infrastruct…
The problem with e-mail is that gathering the meta-data is almost as valuable as looking inside at the message contents. Secure messaging layers aren't going to help you there - unless everyone starts using something like Tor.
Announcing The Dark Mail Alliance – Founded by Silent Circle and Lavabit
121–130 of 217 posts
Re: Announcing The Dark Mail Alliance – Founded by Silent Circle and Lavabit
#122Earlier quoted context omitted.
"Well, Bob, as your viewers may know, 'Smith Mail' came out of a group that calls themselves 'The Dark Mail Alliance'. This is a group of anti-government hackers that..."
"... keep their software in a so called 'subversion' repository, clearly for nefarious ends."
Re: Announcing The Dark Mail Alliance – Founded by Silent Circle and Lavabit
#123My Fucking Mail would be a better name. As in, it's mine, do fucking not read it. Sorry for the profanity but I think it fits how many people feel about this.
Re: Announcing The Dark Mail Alliance – Founded by Silent Circle and Lavabit
#124Earlier quoted context omitted.
I totally agree, I really think you should change the name. Some suggestions: - Locke Mail [from John Locke] - Mill Mail [from John Stuart Mill] - Hobbes Mail - Liberty Mail
Freedom \ Liberty \ Patriot \ Constitution Mail would be very effective in blocking political speeches and biased headlines from cheap attacks. My personal favorite is Lincoln Mail... Seems highly appropriate on many levels and should be FOX News proof.
Re: Announcing The Dark Mail Alliance – Founded by Silent Circle and Lavabit
#125My Fucking Mail would be a better name. As in, it's mine, do fucking not read it. Sorry for the profanity but I think it fits how many people feel about this.
I do share your sentiment! The shorter "MyMail" makes the same point without needing the profanity, and your more emphatic name would then be available for the most desirable MyMail client...
Re: Announcing The Dark Mail Alliance – Founded by Silent Circle and Lavabit
#126Earlier quoted context omitted.
But Envelopes leak metadata as well.
The NSA gets "mail covers" on every piece of US Postal Service mail: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/04/us/monitoring-of-snail-mai... the Mail Isolation Control and Tracking program, in which Postal Service computers photograph the exterior of every piece of paper mail that is processed in the United States
Re: Announcing The Dark Mail Alliance – Founded by Silent Circle and Lavabit
#127Re: Announcing The Dark Mail Alliance – Founded by Silent Circle and Lavabit
#128I appreciate the cheekiness of calling it the "Dark Mail Alliance", but from a purely PR perspective, it would make sense to reconsider your name if you are taking the position that encrypted end-to-end email is not solely an interest of those pursuing shady or deviant activities.
I totally agree, I really think you should change the name. Some suggestions: - Locke Mail [from John Locke] - Mill Mail [from John Stuart Mill] - Hobbes Mail - Liberty Mail
I would go with something like 'sealed mail' and imply the imagery of how in the olden days mail was sealed with a wax stamp. A strong visual analogy can be very powerful.
Re: Announcing The Dark Mail Alliance – Founded by Silent Circle and Lavabit
#129Earlier quoted context omitted.
I totally agree, I really think you should change the name. Some suggestions: - Locke Mail [from John Locke] - Mill Mail [from John Stuart Mill] - Hobbes Mail - Liberty Mail
Yes please reconsider the name. I would go with something like 'sealed mail' and imply the imagery of how in the olden days mail was sealed with a wax stamp. A strong visual analogy can be very powerful.