> one can even, if one jeers loudly enough, send some
worn-out and useless phrase ... into the dustbin,
where it belongs.
Such a fitting sentence on which to end the essay, since "dustbin" is no longer part of the modern English lexicon, as far as I know.George Orwell: Politics and the English Language (1946)
11–20 of 67 posts
Re: George Orwell: Politics and the English Language (1946)
#12I spent the next 5 years introducing it to others as a a precursor to any copy-editing sessions.
Re: George Orwell: Politics and the English Language (1946)
#13Other great examples:
http://orwell.ru/library/essays/wiw/english/e_wiw
http://orwell.ru/library/articles/nose/english/e_nose
Is anyone writing today with that particular quality (i.e. that combination of clarity and directness)? All the candidates I can think of fall far short of it, and only clarify how distinctive Orwell is.
Edit: It's also interesting that this material is now widely seen as classic when at the time it was mere pamphleteering. To my knowledge, Orwell wasn't thought of as a hack—he was respected—but this sort of writing was regarded, even by him, as throwaway work, with a sense that it was too bad that circumstances didn't allow him to do better. (He touches on that in "Why I Write", the first link above.) It's a common theme in the history of art for high-status things to start out as low-status things; this may be a case of that.
Edit 2: Another interesting thing—he was writing this stuff about current events in more or less real time. That's a very murky pond to be looking into. I would very much like to know what it was that gave Orwell that degree of insight.
Re: George Orwell: Politics and the English Language (1946)
#14> one can even, if one jeers loudly enough, send some worn-out and useless phrase ... into the dustbin, where it belongs. Such a fitting sentence on which to end the essay, since "dustbin" is no longer part of the modern English lexicon, as far as I know.
Re: George Orwell: Politics and the English Language (1946)
#15If you're as turned off by the formatting of this page as I am, I'm currently working on a CSS framework to beautifully display longform text. As luck would have it, this essay was my test case: http://alexgolec.github.io/orwell/politics
Re: George Orwell: Politics and the English Language (1946)
#16Re: George Orwell: Politics and the English Language (1946)
#17> one can even, if one jeers loudly enough, send some worn-out and useless phrase ... into the dustbin, where it belongs. Such a fitting sentence on which to end the essay, since "dustbin" is no longer part of the modern English lexicon, as far as I know.
https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=dustbin%2Cwast...
However, it has be losing in relative rank to 'trash can'. I believe dustbin is far more common in British English than North American English.
Re: George Orwell: Politics and the English Language (1946)
#18> one can even, if one jeers loudly enough, send some worn-out and useless phrase ... into the dustbin, where it belongs. Such a fitting sentence on which to end the essay, since "dustbin" is no longer part of the modern English lexicon, as far as I know.
Re: George Orwell: Politics and the English Language (1946)
#19If you're as turned off by the formatting of this page as I am, I'm currently working on a CSS framework to beautifully display longform text. As luck would have it, this essay was my test case: http://alexgolec.github.io/orwell/politics
Re: George Orwell: Politics and the English Language (1946)
#20"What am I trying to say? What words will express it? What image or idiom will make it clearer? Is this image fresh enough to have an effect?
And he will probably ask himself two more:
Could I put it more shortly? Have I said anything that is avoidably ugly?"