George Orwell: Politics and the English Language (1946)
alexgolec.github.io
George Orwell: Politics and the English Language (1946)
1–10 of 67 posts
Re: George Orwell: Politics and the English Language (1946)
#2In many ways, it seems like he is talking about memes, just the memes of his own time.
But in between these two classes there is a huge dump of
worn-out metaphors which have lost all evocative power and
are merely used because they save people the trouble of
inventing phrases for themselves.Re: George Orwell: Politics and the English Language (1946)
#3As luck would have it, this essay was my test case:
Re: George Orwell: Politics and the English Language (1946)
#4If you're as turned off by the formatting of this page as I am, I'm currently working on a CSS framework to beautifully display longform text. As luck would have it, this essay was my test case: http://alexgolec.github.io/orwell/politics
Re: George Orwell: Politics and the English Language (1946)
#5If you're as turned off by the formatting of this page as I am, I'm currently working on a CSS framework to beautifully display longform text. As luck would have it, this essay was my test case: http://alexgolec.github.io/orwell/politics
Re: George Orwell: Politics and the English Language (1946)
#6If you're as turned off by the formatting of this page as I am, I'm currently working on a CSS framework to beautifully display longform text. As luck would have it, this essay was my test case: http://alexgolec.github.io/orwell/politics
Re: George Orwell: Politics and the English Language (1946)
#7If you're as turned off by the formatting of this page as I am, I'm currently working on a CSS framework to beautifully display longform text. As luck would have it, this essay was my test case: http://alexgolec.github.io/orwell/politics
edit: Thanks for the update. Looks really nice.
Re: George Orwell: Politics and the English Language (1946)
#8I wonder what he'd say about memes. They seem to be the ultimate self-reinforcing de-evolution of language. In many ways, it seems like he is talking about memes, just the memes of his own time. But in between these two classes there is a huge dump of worn-out metaphors which have lost all evocative power and are merely used because they save people the trouble of inventing phrases for themselves.
Corporate PowerPoint-talk is the spiritual heir of what Orwell is mocking in his rewrite of the Old Testament passage. An ever-growing wall of "strategic" abstractions and vaguely Latin buzzwords is used to hide the debilitating lack of meaning and power that plagues the days of almost every mid-level manager at any established company.
Re: George Orwell: Politics and the English Language (1946)
#9If you're as turned off by the formatting of this page as I am, I'm currently working on a CSS framework to beautifully display longform text. As luck would have it, this essay was my test case: http://alexgolec.github.io/orwell/politics
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/ireader/ppelffpjgk...
Yours does look a little nicer, though. You should make it an extension.
Re: George Orwell: Politics and the English Language (1946)
#10I wonder what he'd say about memes. They seem to be the ultimate self-reinforcing de-evolution of language. In many ways, it seems like he is talking about memes, just the memes of his own time. But in between these two classes there is a huge dump of worn-out metaphors which have lost all evocative power and are merely used because they save people the trouble of inventing phrases for themselves.
I don't know about that. At least memes don't pretend to be anything else than they are. They are the unabashed verbal and visual equivalent of musical jingles, things designed to grab your attention and stick in your head, but nobody is suggesting that jingles are equivalent to Beethoven. Corporate PowerPoint-talk is the spiritual heir of what Orwell is mocking in his rewrite of the Old Testament passage. An ever-gr…
But if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt
thought. A bad usage can spread by tradition and imitation
even among people who should and do know better.