Rails may well find it's popularity and prestige diminished, but I doubt it'll "die" anytime in any of our lifetimes.
Why Meteor will kill Ruby on Rails
31–40 of 336 posts
Re: Why Meteor will kill Ruby on Rails
#32"When a client asks us to build an app, they are really asking for a fully interactive web app that utilizes javascript to get rich client interfaces." Or maybe they really are just asking you for an app, but you'd rather build a fully interactive web app that utilizes javascript to get rich client interfaces.
No, the client that spawned this blog post was specifically asked for heavy google maps integration. We haven't had one client asking for just a server side app in years. I've been doing this for 8-9 years, I have a good idea on how to talk with my clients :)
Re: Why Meteor will kill Ruby on Rails
#33Re: Why Meteor will kill Ruby on Rails
#34Re: Why Meteor will kill Ruby on Rails
#35Re: Why Meteor will kill Ruby on Rails
#36Maybe it's common not to have good unit-tests? (integration/functional-test does not count as unit-test).
Re: Why Meteor will kill Ruby on Rails
#37Re: Why Meteor will kill Ruby on Rails
#38> What if you could spend your time in one language > and one framework? What if you eat everything with a fork?
Try it before you knock it, I would bet money you would enjoy it.
I'd much prefer if some day the reverse was possible: writing Python or Ruby on the backend AND the frontend. I imagine something like that would render Node rather useless. (And no, they did not invent the first or the last usable asynchronous web framework.)
Re: Why Meteor will kill Ruby on Rails
#39The link is now a 404..I hope it wasn't powered by Meteor...
I DO think that Meteor is fucking awesome, due to the sheer speed you can crank out commonly requested features (you can add a Google/Facebook/Github Oauth login widget with one line of code), but it sure as hell doesn't seem to scale well these days.
Re: Why Meteor will kill Ruby on Rails
#40Blog try to refresh after HN traffic killed the backend.