The Battle for Power on the Internet
schneier.com
The Battle for Power on the Internet
1–10 of 34 posts
Re: The Battle for Power on the Internet
#2The political side of this should be encouraging or at least not discouraging the deployment of such technologies. Laws can be changed more easily than technologies. Deploy a secure infrastructure now; if the law changes later, the technology will still protect us.
[1] https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity12/social-ne...
Re: The Battle for Power on the Internet
#3Re: The Battle for Power on the Internet
#4The other side of this is countrys using the NSA furor as an excuse to create a more balkanized Internet fire walling off themselves form those nasty furineers.
Re: The Battle for Power on the Internet
#5Re: The Battle for Power on the Internet
#6The other side of this is countrys using the NSA furor as an excuse to create a more balkanized Internet fire walling off themselves form those nasty furineers.
I would hardly call "other countries" reactions just an excuse... If the internet becomes more balkanized, it is on the NSA and American government's head, nobody else's.
Re: The Battle for Power on the Internet
#7We can reverse the trend as consumers, by questioning our consuming behaviour. And as hackers, by building tools that the users like and which make the web more free.
Power is where the money is. And power makes legislation. It will only get harder from now on..
But on the upside, software is a very malleable thing. New applications can be developed quickly. And they can replace established ones.
Re: The Battle for Power on the Internet
#8The other side of this is countrys using the NSA furor as an excuse to create a more balkanized Internet fire walling off themselves form those nasty furineers.
I would hardly call "other countries" reactions just an excuse... If the internet becomes more balkanized, it is on the NSA and American government's head, nobody else's.
Re: The Battle for Power on the Internet
#9That's not a given. Not only is it trivially easy to host your own email, there are a number of very positive side-effects of doing so. For instance, when I email my wife, it's just a local copy operation - no network traffic is generated, and thus nothing can be intercepted by third parties.
Further, although I have not done it yet, it appears to be only slightly more technically challenging to provide your own dialtone.
In 2013 the Internet traffic I actually do generate is much more secure than the Internet traffic I generated 20 years ago. Now I have a VPN to various endpoints around the globe. That's much better than telnet to tc.umn.edu :)
The disconnect here is that he is talking about particular consumer properties (walled gardens) that happen to exist on the Internet. It surprises me, given who the author is.
Re: The Battle for Power on the Internet
#10This is a great piece that should go to top of HN. We can reverse the trend as consumers, by questioning our consuming behaviour. And as hackers, by building tools that the users like and which make the web more free. Power is where the money is. And power makes legislation. It will only get harder from now on.. But on the upside, software is a very malleable thing. New applications can be developed quickly. And they…
No, you can't. You can reverse this trend as a peer on the network, but not as a consumer.