Spyder – Scientific Python Development Environment
code.google.com
Spyder – Scientific Python Development Environment
1–10 of 30 posts
Re: Spyder – Scientific Python Development Environment
#2Re: Spyder – Scientific Python Development Environment
#3On the other hand, only with spyder I get that many annoying trailing spaces for some reaseon.
Re: Spyder – Scientific Python Development Environment
#4Does anyone with experience with this IDE have an opinion about whether it is superior to pycharm?
Re: Spyder – Scientific Python Development Environment
#5Does anyone with experience with this IDE have an opinion about whether it is superior to pycharm?
The target audience is very different. Spyder is a kind of Matlab interface replacement, and as such focuses a lot more on interactive aspects. Not sure IDE is even the correct word for it.
Re: Spyder – Scientific Python Development Environment
#6I appreciate the great effort behind Spyder but I think the UI and the documentation, website etc lack a lot of polishing and attention. I have tried it a couple times and I never get around simple things, like installing packages and the environment.
[1] http://pytools.codeplex.com
Re: Spyder – Scientific Python Development Environment
#7Does anyone with experience with this IDE have an opinion about whether it is superior to pycharm?
Re: Spyder – Scientific Python Development Environment
#8Re: Spyder – Scientific Python Development Environment
#9Re: Spyder – Scientific Python Development Environment
#10For those not aware, it's basically an offshoot of python(x,y), which is a really nice python distribution for windows.
Personally, I'm far, far too wedded to vim + ipython to use anything else, but it is _really_ nice to be able to point people using windows to python(x,y). I have nothing against commercial distributions like canopy or anaconda (which offer many advantages), but there are a lot of cases where a freely-redistributable option makes more sense.