How huge is a 1mm beam when it hits the moon (and visa-versa) ? I wonder if wolframalpha can tell me... Actually, I don't even know how to ask it the proper question. Can anyone make this formula work in wolfram? http://laserpointerforums.com/attachments/f51/17952-calculat... update: I think I figured this out as ((λ * L) / d)* 2 (((630nm in meters)*(380000km in meters)) / (1mm in meters)) * 2 Which would be a nearly…
NASA Laser Communication System Sets Record with Transmissions to and from Moon
11–20 of 84 posts
Re: NASA Laser Communication System Sets Record with Transmissions to and from Moon
#12Either way, it's pretty incredible. Even if the 622 Mbps down isn't completely error free, but maybe 99%, you just need to use a video compression algorithm that is error tolerant.
Re: NASA Laser Communication System Sets Record with Transmissions to and from Moon
#13Re: NASA Laser Communication System Sets Record with Transmissions to and from Moon
#14Re: NASA Laser Communication System Sets Record with Transmissions to and from Moon
#15The latency must be huge though.
Or would it? Perhaps simply increasing the retransmission timer would give us interplanetary internet. I wonder.
Re: NASA Laser Communication System Sets Record with Transmissions to and from Moon
#16Re: NASA Laser Communication System Sets Record with Transmissions to and from Moon
#17The latency must be huge though.
I'd imagine TCP, as a protocol starts to fall over with moon-to-earth latencies. Or would it? Perhaps simply increasing the retransmission timer would give us interplanetary internet. I wonder.
Re: NASA Laser Communication System Sets Record with Transmissions to and from Moon
#18The latency must be huge though.
I'd imagine TCP, as a protocol starts to fall over with moon-to-earth latencies. Or would it? Perhaps simply increasing the retransmission timer would give us interplanetary internet. I wonder.
Re: NASA Laser Communication System Sets Record with Transmissions to and from Moon
#19The article cites 622 Mbps down, 20 Mbps error-free up. Is the implication that the 622 Mbps down is before error correction? Either way, it's pretty incredible. Even if the 622 Mbps down isn't completely error free, but maybe 99%, you just need to use a video compression algorithm that is error tolerant.
Re: NASA Laser Communication System Sets Record with Transmissions to and from Moon
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'd imagine TCP, as a protocol starts to fall over with moon-to-earth latencies. Or would it? Perhaps simply increasing the retransmission timer would give us interplanetary internet. I wonder.
Moon to earth should be workable enough...average speed of light roundtrip will be about 2400ms.