Apple Says New OS X ‘Mavericks’ Will Be Offered for Free
321–330 of 369 posts
Re: Apple Says New OS X ‘Mavericks’ Will Be Offered for Free
#322Earlier quoted context omitted.
free fre·er, fre·est, adverb, verb, freed, free·ing. adjective 1. enjoying personal rights or liberty, as a person who is not in slavery: a land of free people. 2. pertaining to or reserved for those who enjoy personal liberty: They were thankful to be living on free soil. 3. existing under, characterized by, or possessing civil and political liberties that are, as a rule, constitutionally guaranteed by representativ…
lit·er·al·ly 1. in a literal manner or sense; exactly. 2. used for emphasis or to express strong feeling while not being literally true. Words are literally defined by how they are actually used by humans over time. If I hold up a sign saying "Free Donuts", no one is going to think I mean that pastries should be liberated. To unnecessarily cling to the word "free" when it has a more obvious secondary meaning is to ti…
Re: Apple Says New OS X ‘Mavericks’ Will Be Offered for Free
#323Earlier quoted context omitted.
Apple has taken measures to technologically limit your ability to do so. When I bought my most recent MacBook Pro it came with Lion. Because of network issues at work I could't use Lion (still can't), so I tried to put Snow Leopard in a VM (using the copy I had previously put on my now defunct MacBook Pro) but Apple and VMWare had put in technological blockers to prevent putting SL on a Lion VM or Lion on a SL VM. So…
I suspect there were other factors which prevented your success. There were no measures to technologically limit one's ability to perform multiple installations from a purchased OS X install disc. You could buy two different Tiger installers and they'd checksum the same, and there were no serial numbers to be entered. It was an honor thing.
I'm reasonably confident the OS didn't actively try to detect that it was running in a VM, but VMware Fusion (and presumably other such software) would prevent you from installing the OS.
There was a relatively simple work around (a hack) that allowed you to install in a VM. I think it was as simple as touching the right path.
Re: Apple Says New OS X ‘Mavericks’ Will Be Offered for Free
#324Re: Apple Says New OS X ‘Mavericks’ Will Be Offered for Free
#325Earlier quoted context omitted.
I suspect there were other factors which prevented your success. There were no measures to technologically limit one's ability to perform multiple installations from a purchased OS X install disc. You could buy two different Tiger installers and they'd checksum the same, and there were no serial numbers to be entered. It was an honor thing.
There was a restriction on VMs, but they've since eased up on that. I imagine it was because of the Hackintosh thing. I'm reasonably confident the OS didn't actively try to detect that it was running in a VM, but VMware Fusion (and presumably other such software) would prevent you from installing the OS. There was a relatively simple work around (a hack) that allowed you to install in a VM. I think it was as simple a…
Edited to add: You are correct, the technical restriction was on the VMWare side, but IIRC it was because of legal threats from Apple. Apparently earlier versions of VMWare would run SL without any problems, but the VMWare version I had would not not and I couldn't get a copy of the older version.
Re: Apple Says New OS X ‘Mavericks’ Will Be Offered for Free
#326Earlier quoted context omitted.
Apple has taken measures to technologically limit your ability to do so. When I bought my most recent MacBook Pro it came with Lion. Because of network issues at work I could't use Lion (still can't), so I tried to put Snow Leopard in a VM (using the copy I had previously put on my now defunct MacBook Pro) but Apple and VMWare had put in technological blockers to prevent putting SL on a Lion VM or Lion on a SL VM. So…
Yea, you had to use the server version of Snow Leopard.
Re: Apple Says New OS X ‘Mavericks’ Will Be Offered for Free
#327Right. Apple event today. What on earth compelled Nokia to launch their new Windows-tablet on the same day?
Nokia announced their event first. Two ways to read Apple then targeting the same day - For the Apple Fanboy: Apple wasn't even aware Nokia was releasing anything, because honestly, it's windows mobile so who cares, and this is pure coincidence. For the Msft Fanboy: Apple releases a sad, incremental improvement in hardware that isn't their primary focus anymore in an attempt to keep the attention off of a rival.
Re: Apple Says New OS X ‘Mavericks’ Will Be Offered for Free
#328Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can: I upgraded my Mountain Lion test machine to Mavericks when DP1 landed and created a Parallels virtual machine for Mountain Lion. However, I found—at least with Parallels—you can't just take an existing hard drive image and use that: you have to create a new virtual machine, install Mountain Lion from scratch on it, then use OS X's Migration Assistant to move everything over.
Thanks. My Mac came with Mountain lion pre-installed; where can I find install media to install ML into parallels?
Re: Apple Says New OS X ‘Mavericks’ Will Be Offered for Free
#329 Base SDK = 10.9
Minimum Deployment Target = 10.9Re: Apple Says New OS X ‘Mavericks’ Will Be Offered for Free
#330Earlier quoted context omitted.
The installer itself can do this: sudo /Applications/Install\ OS\ X\ Mavericks.app/Contents/Resources/createinstallmedia –volume /Volumes/WHATEVER_DISK –applicationpath /Applications/Install\ OS\ X\ Mavericks.app –nointeraction
I used: sudo "/Applications/Install OS X Mavericks.app/Contents/Resources/createinstallmedia" --volume /Volumes/Mavericks/ --applicationpath "/Applications/Install OS X Mavericks.app" Note the double hyphens before the keywords. The quotes just make it easier to read.