The competition is already free and Apple has still a high security prison as far as the lock-in effect of its technology is concerned, so they're still safe.
Apple Says New OS X ‘Mavericks’ Will Be Offered for Free
111–120 of 369 posts
Re: Apple Says New OS X ‘Mavericks’ Will Be Offered for Free
#112https://itunes.apple.com/app/os-x-mavericks/id675248567?mt=1...
Re: Apple Says New OS X ‘Mavericks’ Will Be Offered for Free
#113Some would say that Mavericks was launched for free because Windows 8.1 did the same. Those same people might also say that Apple did one better by offering the update for computers running older than the most recent version of their software.
OS X upgrade revenue is now such a minuscule piece of the pie that it probably doesn't matter anymore.
Re: Apple Says New OS X ‘Mavericks’ Will Be Offered for Free
#114Re: Apple Says New OS X ‘Mavericks’ Will Be Offered for Free
#115If you're too busy to read the whole article or watch the keynote, also note that you can upgrade directly from Snow Leopard or later. They listed the hardware models which will take it as well– the 2007 Mac Minis and MacBook Pros are supposedly good to go.
While they may be good to go, I still like waiting a week to upgrade apple products. They do occasionally break things important to my workflow. The last one for me was VirtualBox support along with the Xcode commandline tools. While workarounds and patches appear fairly quickly, it is prudent not to put myself out of action, potentially for days or weeks, if I can avoid it.
Re: Apple Says New OS X ‘Mavericks’ Will Be Offered for Free
#116So where can I go to download an ISO? I'd like to burn a bootable DVD, and load it up as a non-networked offline install. Is such a thing even possible?
Re: Apple Says New OS X ‘Mavericks’ Will Be Offered for Free
#117The whole free OS which can only run upon hardware they have already sold you is reminding me of how IBM used to sell AIX and moved into giving it away free as it would only run upon hardware only they made and sold you. Question is though, what about support. You have a 3 year old Mac of some flavour and upgrade to this OS, what about issues you may have. ANother aspect would be that by in effect making this level o…
Whatever they're planning, getting everyone on board is obviously an important part of that.
I think the biggest thing over the last two keynotes is the iWork update - MS have been ridicuslously slow in the one area they could have won, which was bringing Office to iOS. I'm pretty sure this is the nail in the coffin.
Re: Apple Says New OS X ‘Mavericks’ Will Be Offered for Free
#118I own a 2008 15" MBP. I didn't want to upgrade from Snow Leopard - there seemed to be a synergy between SL and my hardware. Even for free, I'm weary of upgrading my OS. Too scared to take a performance hit.
Re: Apple Says New OS X ‘Mavericks’ Will Be Offered for Free
#119The whole free OS which can only run upon hardware they have already sold you is reminding me of how IBM used to sell AIX and moved into giving it away free as it would only run upon hardware only they made and sold you. Question is though, what about support. You have a 3 year old Mac of some flavour and upgrade to this OS, what about issues you may have. ANother aspect would be that by in effect making this level o…
Re: Apple Says New OS X ‘Mavericks’ Will Be Offered for Free
#120The whole free OS which can only run upon hardware they have already sold you is reminding me of how IBM used to sell AIX and moved into giving it away free as it would only run upon hardware only they made and sold you. Question is though, what about support. You have a 3 year old Mac of some flavour and upgrade to this OS, what about issues you may have. ANother aspect would be that by in effect making this level o…
On the other hand, once upon a time Apple made you pay for software which also run upon hardware only they made and sold you. Back before Snow Leopard, that was $129 per user (though installable on an unlimited number of machines)