Visual Studio 2013 released to web

#1

Post by pjvds » Thu, Oct 17, 2013, 11:32 AM UTC

Visual Studio 2013 released to web
blogs.msdn.com

Re: Visual Studio 2013 released to web

#2

Post by scrabble » Thu, Oct 17, 2013, 11:47 AM UTC

I'm still using VS 2010 at work. Can't seem to make a compelling case to upgrade for the cost, and it's just getting more frustrating.

VS 2013 is looking like a really great product, especially in comparison to VS 2010.

Re: Visual Studio 2013 released to web

#3

Post by kossmoboleat » Thu, Oct 17, 2013, 11:52 AM UTC

scrabble wrote: post #2

I'm still using VS 2010 at work. Can't seem to make a compelling case to upgrade for the cost, and it's just getting more frustrating. VS 2013 is looking like a really great product, especially in comparison to VS 2010.

VS 2008 here, somebody apparently tested 2012 but nothing came out of it with people fearing that a different C++ compiler will break everything...

Re: Visual Studio 2013 released to web

#4

Post by tonyedgecombe » Thu, Oct 17, 2013, 11:53 AM UTC

kossmoboleat wrote: post #3

scrabble wrote: post #2

I'm still using VS 2010 at work. Can't seem to make a compelling case to upgrade for the cost, and it's just getting more frustrating. VS 2013 is looking like a really great product, especially in comparison to VS 2010.

VS 2008 here, somebody apparently tested 2012 but nothing came out of it with people fearing that a different C++ compiler will break everything...

I just upgraded a VS2008 project to VS2010 and got a huge boost in compile times, worth it for that alone.

Re: Visual Studio 2013 released to web

#5

Post by [deleted] » Thu, Oct 17, 2013, 11:55 AM UTC

[deleted]

Re: Visual Studio 2013 released to web

#6

Post by scrabble » Thu, Oct 17, 2013, 11:57 AM UTC

kossmoboleat wrote: post #3

scrabble wrote: post #2

I'm still using VS 2010 at work. Can't seem to make a compelling case to upgrade for the cost, and it's just getting more frustrating. VS 2013 is looking like a really great product, especially in comparison to VS 2010.

VS 2008 here, somebody apparently tested 2012 but nothing came out of it with people fearing that a different C++ compiler will break everything...

I think the improvements we'd get in Entity Framework performance, testing, and analysis would be well worth it.

Re: Visual Studio 2013 released to web

#7

Post by ptr » Thu, Oct 17, 2013, 12:04 PM UTC

[deleted] wrote: post #5

[deleted]

That's on Linux, running Mono. Would be interesting to get a more fair comparison wrt language.

Re: Visual Studio 2013 released to web

#8

Post by mauricedb » Thu, Oct 17, 2013, 12:09 PM UTC

Cool :-)

Re: Visual Studio 2013 released to web

#9

Post by [deleted] » Thu, Oct 17, 2013, 12:11 PM UTC

ptr wrote: post #7

[deleted] wrote: post #5

[deleted]

That's on Linux, running Mono. Would be interesting to get a more fair comparison wrt language.

[deleted]

Re: Visual Studio 2013 released to web

#10

Post by mu_killnine » Thu, Oct 17, 2013, 12:11 PM UTC

Very nice. I really love 2012 and the 2013 RC was pretty solid as well. The step up from 2010 was the most pronounced, as 2012 just runs circles around 2010 in (albeit, my own anecdotal) performance.

Just gotta wait for an upgrade license of R# to go on sale, as R#7 isn't compatible with 2013 ;(