Live data from Hacker News

Stack Exchange's monitoring system is now open source

github.com

1–10 of 57 posts

Re: Stack Exchange's monitoring system is now open source

#5
Having a quick poke around and I notice that they are storing all exceptions in an SQL database. I've been looking at storing all the errors we get in our various applications in a central repository and was wondering what the general consensus was?

Currently I'm going a centralised logstash server and using a logstash shipper on each of my servers to push the exceptions, from a standard logfile to it. I was toying with the idea of pushing all my errors at source to an SQL database but figured if I was having database problems I'd be missing all the exceptions that I could be using to trigger the alerts that I'm having database problems!

Re: Stack Exchange's monitoring system is now open source

#7

Having a quick poke around and I notice that they are storing all exceptions in an SQL database. I've been looking at storing all the errors we get in our various applications in a central repository and was wondering what the general consensus was? Currently I'm going a centralised logstash server and using a logstash shipper on each of my servers to push the exceptions, from a standard logfile to it. I was toying w…

There is no general consensus, but there's no rule that say you can only have one central watchdog. Collect errors one place, watch over you db somewhere else, watch over your watchdogs somewhere else still. This is basic sysadmin CYA.
Post reply on HN