Earlier quoted context omitted.
Many submissions aren't actually made in the given time period. They usually will bring either a partially to fully complete project (pretty sure it's cheating but yeah).
I don't think this is true, actually. I've been to two major hackathons and had many friends at HackMIT this fall, and this really doesn't occur- in fact, the culture was the exact opposite, people were strongly discouraged from bringing in already existing projects and almost nobody did.
MIT Hackathon winners
21–30 of 32 posts
Re: MIT Hackathon winners
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
Many submissions aren't actually made in the given time period. They usually will bring either a partially to fully complete project (pretty sure it's cheating but yeah).
That's really not the case. I'm a regular on the hackathon circuit and it's extremely rare & frowned upon for people to start building before the hackathon. Plus, if you doubt it, peruse their GitHub's and you can see clear building.
Re: MIT Hackathon winners
#23If it actually works well, I'd download "Images as Text" as a Chrome extension in a blink.
Disclaimer: Microsoftie
Re: MIT Hackathon winners
#24If it actually works well, I'd download "Images as Text" as a Chrome extension in a blink.
I'm working on an OCR project at the moment; I'd love to see which library they used.
Re: MIT Hackathon winners
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's really not the case. I'm a regular on the hackathon circuit and it's extremely rare & frowned upon for people to start building before the hackathon. Plus, if you doubt it, peruse their GitHub's and you can see clear building.
What's the best way to find their GitHubs? Do many/all projects make their source available online for people to learn from?
Re: MIT Hackathon winners
#26Re: MIT Hackathon winners
#27Every school in every field need something like this. It's amazing to just give people a small set of rules and let them compete in a short period of time. That's better training for life than sitting and listening to a teacher (don't get me wrong, a bit of that is good too). There is no better learning and knowledge retention than by doing...
Re: MIT Hackathon winners
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's really not the case. I'm a regular on the hackathon circuit and it's extremely rare & frowned upon for people to start building before the hackathon. Plus, if you doubt it, peruse their GitHub's and you can see clear building.
What's the best way to find their GitHubs? Do many/all projects make their source available online for people to learn from?
As for finding them, I'll often just look up the hackers on GitHub and check if they have new repos.
Though that's not always the case. I kept the repo for the hack I made this weekend (http://socialsecurity.io — antivirus for Twitter) private because I'm commercializing some of the machine learning.
Re: MIT Hackathon winners
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't think this is true, actually. I've been to two major hackathons and had many friends at HackMIT this fall, and this really doesn't occur- in fact, the culture was the exact opposite, people were strongly discouraged from bringing in already existing projects and almost nobody did.
when are the topics announced, tho? any ideas on that...
Re: MIT Hackathon winners
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
What's the best way to find their GitHubs? Do many/all projects make their source available online for people to learn from?
Most of the teams I talked to, mine included, were using private repos. As much as I trust the community and my peers, it would be interesting to require public git projects during a hackathon. Not only would they be a fantastic learning tool, the potential data visualizations would provide a really cool postmortem.