Live data from Hacker News

Poll: App rejected. Is this offensive? Seriously Apple?

news.ycombinator.com

21–27 of 27 posts

Re: Poll: App rejected. Is this offensive? Seriously Apple?

#21

Two anecdotes. Perfect Dark, the N64 game released around the year 2000, got given an 18 certificate in the UK because of the fact that blood can splatter from shot enemies onto walls. Raiders Of The Lost Ark, the film released in 1981, nearly got refused a PG [edit: thanks, bena] certificate because it showed exploding heads. The picture you linked depicts both of these acts of violence, whereas Wolfenstein 3D does…

You probably mean PG, as that's what Raiders was rated.

PG 13 was created when Temple of Doom came out, because the gap between PG and R was too great. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motion_Picture_Association_of_A...

Re: Poll: App rejected. Is this offensive? Seriously Apple?

#22
Context. This picture lacks context for me to judge whether it is offensive or not.

Question. You lost context there as well. What am I answering with a "Yes"? "Yes, seriously Apple?" "Yes, it is offensive?" "Yes, you're missing something?"

Don't take this the wrong way, but I am inclined to think it's the "Yes, you're missing something" option, and what you're missing is context.

Re: Poll: App rejected. Is this offensive? Seriously Apple?

#26
I'm simply amazed by how people accept _any_ company dictating what they can and cannot do with computers (an iPhone is a computer) the people _own_. Forget discussing when/how Apple might 'loosen' restrictions...why are you accepting restrictions, at all. It's very disturbing how Apple and others are re-defining the nature of ownership and control over our computing devices. But more disturbing is how the public seems to simply accept the new paradigm.
Post reply on HN