16GB Mechanical Memory Key • Hacker News Board

Re: 16GB Mechanical Memory Key

#11

Post by anigbrowl » Tue, Jun 09, 2009, 7:25 AM UTC

Boxer wrote: post #5

I find this USB stick distasteful. It's not mechanical, all the gears do nothing. The designer took parts that had a precise function and rearranged them into something useless for appearance's sake. This is probably a weird reaction, but maybe other hackers felt the same way.

No, it's not just you. Mrs Browl and I felt similar disappointment...as she said, he only had to get one wheel to move and then connect others. Which would still have been aesthetic rather than functional, but would have served the function of showing you it was alive.

Perhaps in version #4.

Re: 16GB Mechanical Memory Key

#12

Post by anigbrowl » Tue, Jun 09, 2009, 7:26 AM UTC

psyklic wrote: post #10

Did he sell it for only $10??

No, that's shipping.

Re: 16GB Mechanical Memory Key

#13

Post by johnnybgoode » Tue, Jun 09, 2009, 7:28 AM UTC

psyklic wrote: post #10

Did he sell it for only $10??

No, but it does look that way at first. $10 was just the shipping cost. The key sold for $165.

The idea of selling that for $10 seems almost criminal! Actually, even $165 sounds low, considering the time and parts he put into it.

Re: 16GB Mechanical Memory Key

#14

Post by J_McQuade » Tue, Jun 09, 2009, 7:41 AM UTC

Boxer wrote: post #5

I find this USB stick distasteful. It's not mechanical, all the gears do nothing. The designer took parts that had a precise function and rearranged them into something useless for appearance's sake. This is probably a weird reaction, but maybe other hackers felt the same way.

I agree entirely! I see a lot of 'steampunk' thinks like this pop up on the MAKE Magazine blog (and similar) and have always found it somewhat onanistic, despite the face-value beauty of some of the pieces.

In the end, I feel that form should follow function. Making something like this look like it should be functioning in ways that it never will perhaps just serves to outline its mundanity.

(Ooh err, I've probably gone and thought about it too much again.)

Re: 16GB Mechanical Memory Key

#15

Post by pierrefar » Tue, Jun 09, 2009, 9:52 AM UTC

Boxer wrote: post #5

I find this USB stick distasteful. It's not mechanical, all the gears do nothing. The designer took parts that had a precise function and rearranged them into something useless for appearance's sake. This is probably a weird reaction, but maybe other hackers felt the same way.

It still looks better than most USB sticks out there, regardless of function.

Re: 16GB Mechanical Memory Key

#16

Post by grandpa » Tue, Jun 09, 2009, 11:15 AM UTC

When did a 12 hour project become "an age"? Real watchmakers like John Harrison spent /years/ on a single piece.

Re: 16GB Mechanical Memory Key

#17

Post by asciilifeform » Tue, Jun 09, 2009, 11:49 AM UTC

Boxer wrote: post #5

I find this USB stick distasteful. It's not mechanical, all the gears do nothing. The designer took parts that had a precise function and rearranged them into something useless for appearance's sake. This is probably a weird reaction, but maybe other hackers felt the same way.

I agree, and this is actually the problem I have with most steampunk sculpture.

Re: 16GB Mechanical Memory Key

#18

Post by mhb » Tue, Jun 09, 2009, 1:23 PM UTC

Boxer wrote: post #5

I find this USB stick distasteful. It's not mechanical, all the gears do nothing. The designer took parts that had a precise function and rearranged them into something useless for appearance's sake. This is probably a weird reaction, but maybe other hackers felt the same way.

I agree. I think this cat and mouse armor is much more pleasing: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=649020

Re: 16GB Mechanical Memory Key

#19

Post by sp332 » Tue, Jun 09, 2009, 1:38 PM UTC

johnnybgoode wrote: post #6

Boxer wrote: post #5

I find this USB stick distasteful. It's not mechanical, all the gears do nothing. The designer took parts that had a precise function and rearranged them into something useless for appearance's sake. This is probably a weird reaction, but maybe other hackers felt the same way.

Your reaction makes sense to me. I did cringe a little bit when I read that he took some of the parts from watches that were over 100 years old. It still looked pretty cool, though. I'm curious to see what else could be done along these lines. The laptop patio11 posted looks incredible.

He probably meant "I had some watch parts almost 100 years old", not like a perfectly cared-for and functioning watch was dismantled for a USB stick.

Re: 16GB Mechanical Memory Key

#20

Post by TrevorJ » Tue, Jun 09, 2009, 2:08 PM UTC

J_McQuade wrote: post #14

Boxer wrote: post #5

I find this USB stick distasteful. It's not mechanical, all the gears do nothing. The designer took parts that had a precise function and rearranged them into something useless for appearance's sake. This is probably a weird reaction, but maybe other hackers felt the same way.

I agree entirely! I see a lot of 'steampunk' thinks like this pop up on the MAKE Magazine blog (and similar) and have always found it somewhat onanistic, despite the face-value beauty of some of the pieces. In the end, I feel that form should follow function. Making something like this look like it should be functioning in ways that it never will perhaps just serves to outline its mundanity. (Ooh err, I've probably g…

I feel much worse about it when car companies or furniture makers try to make one material look like another. Faux wood, faux leather, ect. I consider the steam punk aesthetic to be purely ornamental. That the ornaments may appear at first glance to have some practical purpose doesn't detract from the overall aesthetic for me.