Go 1.1 Function Calls
docs.google.com
Go 1.1 Function Calls
1–10 of 34 posts
Re: Go 1.1 Function Calls
#2Re: Go 1.1 Function Calls
#3Why doesn't google treat non-logged in users the same as those w/o an account?
Re: Go 1.1 Function Calls
#4Russ Cox is a g'damn genius. You can spend hours being fascinated by his code and writing: http://research.swtch.com/
Re: Go 1.1 Function Calls
#5Re: Go 1.1 Function Calls
#6OT: if Google thinks you have an account (based on a cookie I guess) it requires you to login to access this document. So you either need to login or delete the cookie or enable incognito/private mode to access the document. Why doesn't google treat non-logged in users the same as those w/o an account?
It's asking for your password because you apparently do have a Google account and it wants to verify your identity before it lets you access things that are tied to your account.
Re: Go 1.1 Function Calls
#7OT: if Google thinks you have an account (based on a cookie I guess) it requires you to login to access this document. So you either need to login or delete the cookie or enable incognito/private mode to access the document. Why doesn't google treat non-logged in users the same as those w/o an account?
No it doesn't. Visit it in an Incognito window if you don't believe me. It's asking for your password because you apparently do have a Google account and it wants to verify your identity before it lets you access things that are tied to your account.
Re: Go 1.1 Function Calls
#8Ios disallows dynamic code generation at runtime - what other environments could Go target with these restrictions?
Re: Go 1.1 Function Calls
#9OT: if Google thinks you have an account (based on a cookie I guess) it requires you to login to access this document. So you either need to login or delete the cookie or enable incognito/private mode to access the document. Why doesn't google treat non-logged in users the same as those w/o an account?
I wager what they actually want to do is treat those without an account the same as those who are not logged in, but realize they can't get away with that quite yet. (That is to say, I suspect that they would like to turn away all users without accounts.)