11–20 of 261 posts
My security keypad will actually be a fingerprint scanner. Anyone who watches someone press a sequence of buttons or dusts the pad for fingerprints then subsequently tries to enter by repeating that sequence will trigger the alarm system.
Why not have the sequence remain the password, but also scan fingerprints? If you have the wrong fingerprints (username), the right password still won't work.
A very good point. One of the most important things about strong authentication schemes is the revocation protocol. When things go bad, how easy and secure is the process of changing the auth mechanism? The trouble with fingerprints is that you're stuck with them for life, even if somebody else gets their hands on them .
I'll be interested when someone breaks Touch ID in a real life theft. This is not a simple process, it's not clear that a determined thief is even likely to find a good enough print in a real life case, and you can't mess around because after 5 failed attempts it will prompt for a password. Touch ID will likely cover the vast majority of security use cases for iPhone owners.
However, I think the point of the article is that you can change a compromised password, you can't change a compromised fingerprint. As is mentioned, there are plenty of databases with fingerprint information. Also, for the crowd that is paranoid about government accessing their data, an authority might have an easier time getting into a device when they already have your fingerprint as opposed to figuring out your passwords.
I'm not so sure. How many people are motivated to dupe your fingerprints to get into your iPhone? How many of those people could conceivably get into your iPhone through other ways? Fingerprints are a nice way to keep almost everyone out of your device. And for the rest, well, I really doubt some other locking mechanism would've kept them out.
I'm sure 5s's are fetching at least $400 on the conservative side. If all I have to do is spend like $5 and follow a how-to on a website, I think a lot of people would be willing to make the investment.
I'm not so sure. How many people are motivated to dupe your fingerprints to get into your iPhone? How many of those people could conceivably get into your iPhone through other ways? Fingerprints are a nice way to keep almost everyone out of your device. And for the rest, well, I really doubt some other locking mechanism would've kept them out.
I'm not so sure. How many people are motivated to dupe your fingerprints to get into your iPhone? How many of those people could conceivably get into your iPhone through other ways? Fingerprints are a nice way to keep almost everyone out of your device. And for the rest, well, I really doubt some other locking mechanism would've kept them out.
One theft isn't practical? How about a million? Driven by a never-ending pursuit of monetary gain via crime; with criminals always happy to conquer the latest technology wave. There's absolutely no reason to think that criminals won't amass substantial finger print records just like they do any other intimate information they can get their hands on, from SS numbers to passwords. It's not a question of if, but when this starts becoming common.
All it requires is linking finger prints to something valuable at a mass market scale, and that will drive an unlimited criminal demand for finger prints.
It's not about the iPhone. It's about a consumer shift to finger prints as a primary security feature, and whether that is sane (with the iPhone potentially setting the trend given its cultural status).
then don't use it. For me, it far outweighs having to type my password in everytime.
However, those of us that set security on company devices are very interested in the quality of different methods, and are glad to as many learned opinions on the matter as possible.