Live data from Hacker News

3D-print a Norwegian fjord from your browser

terrafab.bengler.no

31–39 of 39 posts

Re: 3D-print a Norwegian fjord from your browser

#31
post #27

Google's 3D building data for some cities (e.g. here in Edinburgh) is incredible - I'd tempted to get a 3D printer and work out ways of printing interesting parts of town. Maybe my favourite mountains as well from OS data...

I'd love to see this for Scotland. I'd be tempted to buy my favourite Hebrides.

What would be really cool (at least for me) is to be able to print landscape models with geological data included as well....

[e.g. the Black and Red Cuillins of Skye]

Re: 3D-print a Norwegian fjord from your browser

#32

Presumably landscapes with gentle gradients and fewer overhangs are going to be significantly easier to print than architecture.

That depends on the 3D printing technology. Some are perfectly fine with overhangs because the medium is self-supporting, and most can handle small overhangs at each vertical step without much trouble.

Re: 3D-print a Norwegian fjord from your browser

#34
I like backpacking, and often spend money on topographic maps because of this (typically from mytopo.com). I do like this site's idea. It obviously wouldn't work as a map, but it might be nice to integrate a lot of standard topographic map features into the models themselves. Especially if you can do it on really small-scale areas, architects might really want it.

Re: 3D-print a Norwegian fjord from your browser

#38
post #9

"genuine gypsum heirloom mantelpiece display replica" 3D printing is only going to get cheaper and more accessible - I think pretty soon that "heirloom" is going to look like a dollar-store trinket. Still, aside from the hyperbole this is a pretty neat idea, and New Zealand certainly has some landscapes worth this treatment too (including fjords, even). Australia has some impressive cliff forms that would work; seems…

Reminds me of the old aluminium cutlery...

Re: 3D-print a Norwegian fjord from your browser

#39
post #21

It'd be ace if I could 3d print the moon at some sensible scale. Or Mars.

They wouldn't be that interesting. Planetary sized bodies are really spherical (oblate of course.) Even Olympus Mons at 22 km height is only 0.3% of Mars's diameter of 6700 km. If your Mars model was a meter wide, the biggest mountain would protrude for all of 3 mm worth of relief on the surface.
Post reply on HN