Live data from Hacker News

Paying For Privacy?

rayracine.github.io

11–20 of 47 posts

Re: Paying For Privacy?

#11
post #3

I pay github for the same reason I pay heroku. It just works and I don't have to do anything. That is why they exist. Sure you can set up your own git server, but what do you do when it goes down?

Most likely, you have a full copy of the repo on the local disk, and can just push it to another remote.

In this way, DVCS's are resilient to individual server failure.

Re: Paying For Privacy?

#12
In my opinion, and for almost any other remotely similar service, it's not about paying for privacy, it's about paying for convenience. You don't go home to get a beer, when you are going out, you pay extra money for the convenience of not having to carry around beer, an instead be able to buy it on the spot, in any wanted quanitity.

Re: Paying For Privacy?

#13
yet another article that values our time at $0. come on, we all make something like $80-130/hr.

Are you really going to spend less than 1 hour maintain this sort-of-github instance you have?

Re: Paying For Privacy?

#16
post #7

Watch out with the sending email directly from an EC2 instance. You don't really have a fixed IP so rDNS isn't going to work very well, and that's still a front-line filter for a lot of big email providers.

If you are an Amazon EC2 user, you can get started with Amazon SES for free. You can send 2,000 messages for free each day when you call Amazon SES from an Amazon EC2 instance directly or through AWS Elastic Beanstalk. Many applications are able to operate entirely within this free tier limit. http://aws.amazon.com/ses/pricing/ You could also use Mailgun, mandrillapp.com, etc. I believe they all provide at least 10-1…

Yeah, those are all great options. I know for sure Mandrill lets you send SMTP through them and I think Mailgun does too. It's just a matter of configuring your Postfix server to relay through them.

Re: Paying For Privacy?

#17

My team uses pull requests extensively. The master branch is considered good, clean, production-ready code. Anything you want to get into production gets there by way of a pull request. Want to add a feature? Fix a bug? Make a branch, do your thing, and create a pull request against master. The rest of the team reviews your code in the pull request; the comments in a pull request are an excellent feature. My job woul…

I find pull requests handy for working with semi-technical people, for repos only worked on by programmers we just use the format-patch/email workflow, and we have access to each others public repos (would be called "forks" in github parlance I guess).

It's a much better system, faster, more powerful and more flexible but not centralized and you have to understand what you are doing.

It's not like this is a feature github discovered and added. They made an easier, prettier and less powerful version of an existing feature. Certainly not a bad idea, git's command line UI is ridiculously bad UI so a super simple point and click interface was a fantastic way to grab market share and get non-command line people involved.

> the comments in a pull request are an excellent feature

Really? I mean, compared to nothing I guess it would seem great. But since I'm used to an email thread serving the same purpose those comments on github pull requests seem awful to me.

Re: Paying For Privacy?

#19

Off topic: People who use Mother Teresa as the canonical example of selfless altruism need to read something about Mother Teresa so they don't look so silly.

Yeah, no kidding. Feeding and providing medical care for the Untouchables in India? She should have made an iPhone app to help find friends in restaurants nearby, that would have made he a real selfless altriust.

Re: Paying For Privacy?

#20
post #19

Off topic: People who use Mother Teresa as the canonical example of selfless altruism need to read something about Mother Teresa so they don't look so silly.

Yeah, no kidding. Feeding and providing medical care for the Untouchables in India? She should have made an iPhone app to help find friends in restaurants nearby, that would have made he a real selfless altriust.

in her letters she said she was forbiden to provide actual health care. all they gave was a place for the sick to convalesce.

also, she and most othe rreligious still advocate over population and against several sane health treatments. not to mention education.

no little good religion does compensate for the long term damage.

Post reply on HN