PyCharm is amazing, and it can only get better with this announcement. The only issue I have with it is the huge amount of memory it uses. It uses >1GB of ram on my macbook air, and using pycharm for extended amount of time makes it sluggish.
JetBrains releases open-source Python IDE
191–200 of 218 posts
Re: JetBrains releases open-source Python IDE
#192bin/pycharm.sh ERROR: Cannot start PyCharm No JDK found. Please validate either PYCHARM_JDK, JDK_HOME or JAVA_HOME environment variable points to valid JDK installation. I wish this had been mentioned up front, before I spent all that time watching videos and such. :/ Nothing against java per se, just that it's a giant runtime/security-surface that has no bearing on my Python work. I'm still happy with Geany, gvfs, m…
Same here, though I've been following JetBrains for a while. I wish there was some way they could port it to OS X without depending on Java.
Re: JetBrains releases open-source Python IDE
#193Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes I cannot wait. I recently started trying to learn some basic C/C++. My usual initial step in setting up an environment for a new language is to google "intellij plugin for X", so I was very disappointed to find that C/C++ is very poorly supported with respect to most other mainstream languages. I ended up having to go with Visual Studio, which is also impressive, but there are features I miss coming from the Jetb…
To be fair few IDEs support advanced functionality (like refactoring) with C++, due to the monstrosity that it is and the amount of UB. Visual Studio + ReSharper is awesome for C#, IntelliJ is awesome for Java. For C++ you're pretty much screwed.
Re: JetBrains releases open-source Python IDE
#194Just tried Professional one on OSX, CPU goes above 100%. Anyone having same issue?
Re: JetBrains releases open-source Python IDE
#195Just tried Professional one on OSX, CPU goes above 100%. Anyone having same issue?
That can get occasionally annoying, if you drop in a a bunch of 1mb text files in your repository and it insists of examining them.
But, introspection and refactoring capabilities are great.
Re: JetBrains releases open-source Python IDE
#196https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pycharm-community/
Someone is working on Debian packages for it?
Re: JetBrains releases open-source Python IDE
#197Also is the professional version any of the paid licenses on this page http://www.jetbrains.com/pycharm/buy/index.jsp?
It's just that the term "Professional Version" is used to differentiate it from the "Community Edition" on all the informational pages and then the terms are not used anywhere on the Buy page.
Re: JetBrains releases open-source Python IDE
#198Earlier quoted context omitted.
Retraining the brain is difficult in almost any facet. I tried switching keyboard layouts once, suffice it to say I've reverted to ye olde QWERTY.
For what it's worth, I used Eclipse for 3-4 years before Intellij (it was what my university introduced students to for programming in C++ and Java). Switching to Intellij was pretty painless other than initial configuration overload (since there's so much more built into it by default than Eclipse). Having to switch back to Eclipse at times for a few things since was not so much. Intellij just as a much more intuiti…
Re: JetBrains releases open-source Python IDE
#199Re: JetBrains releases open-source Python IDE
#200It's already available in the AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pycharm-community/ Someone is working on Debian packages for it?