Earlier quoted context omitted.
I look past names and use them for the problems they solve.
Well, more power to you I suppose. I just see it as laziness on the part of the founder, and I can't overlook it. edit: you can mod me down all you like, swombat, but I'm just stating what I think, and I doubt I am alone.
I don't much care for the name either, but in the long run, I don't think it matters much. "Google" doesn't sound very serious, "Yahoo" speaks for itself. "Micro" "soft" has been the butt of jokes for a while. Unix is a pretty awful name in its own right. And so on and so forth...