Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

A beginner's cheat sheet for web development

bentobox.io

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

171–180 of 198 posts

Re: A beginner's cheat sheet for web development

#171

Post by crucialfelix »

officialjunk wrote: post #169

iOS chrome: huge white popup with text "{{ boxes[more_index].name }}" Keeps reopening after I close it... will have to check it out on a comp.

its broken on desktop Chrome as well.

but I'm not sure why it go so many upvotes if nobody can view it. obviously some people can.

Uncaught SyntaxError: Unexpected identifier content.js:627 ReferenceError: CONTENT is not defined at new masterCtrl (http://www.bentobox.io/javascripts/main.js:85:17) at d (https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.0.8/angula...) at Object.instantiate (https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.0.8/angula...) at https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.0.8/angula... at https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.0.8/angula... at m (https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.0.8/angula...) at i (https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.0.8/angula...) at e (https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.0.8/angula...) at e (https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.0.8/angula...) at https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.0.8/angula... angular.min.js:63

Re: A beginner's cheat sheet for web development

#176

Post by dylandev »

gremlinsinc wrote: post #163

hey Just pushed some laravel links to This project. . I'm actually wanting to start a dev boot camp her in Dayton that uses online learning resources to teach the fundamentals.. i.e why reinvent the wheel... with pair coding and real idea pitch sessions and learning while working on real startups that we may also help get some traction. ie Dev boot camp meets coworking space meets incubator/accelerator. this will be…

Can I ask for an argument in support of Laravel being the only PHP framework on here? I think it's very "cool" (especially the Silex-esque routing), but there's not a whole lot of Laravel jobs out there.

Re: A beginner's cheat sheet for web development

#178

Post by nielssj »

shn wrote: post #177

Interesting, I do not see anything other than a link to github page. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/50999755/Screen%20Shot%2...

I get the same thing. It seems to be because "content.js" is lacking a comma in some of the elements making it invalid JSON.

Re: A beginner's cheat sheet for web development

#179

Post by Toenex »

crucialfelix wrote: post #171
officialjunk wrote: post #169

iOS chrome: huge white popup with text "{{ boxes[more_index].name }}" Keeps reopening after I close it... will have to check it out on a comp.

its broken on desktop Chrome as well. but I'm not sure why it go so many upvotes if nobody can view it. obviously some people can. Uncaught SyntaxError: Unexpected identifier content.js:627 ReferenceError: CONTENT is not defined at new masterCtrl ( http://www.bentobox.io/javascripts/main.js:85:17 ) at d ( https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.0.8/angula... ) at Object.instantiate ( https://ajax.googleapis…

Yep 'tis broken. I'm guessing site robustness isn't part of the cheat sheet.

Re: A beginner's cheat sheet for web development

#180

Post by dylandev »

Toenex wrote: post #179
crucialfelix wrote: post #171

Earlier quoted context omitted.

its broken on desktop Chrome as well. but I'm not sure why it go so many upvotes if nobody can view it. obviously some people can. Uncaught SyntaxError: Unexpected identifier content.js:627 ReferenceError: CONTENT is not defined at new masterCtrl ( http://www.bentobox.io/javascripts/main.js:85:17 ) at d ( https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.0.8/angula... ) at Object.instantiate ( https://ajax.googleapis…

Yep 'tis broken. I'm guessing site robustness isn't part of the cheat sheet.

How does a syntax error have anything to do with robustness? Now if you had mentioned something that made sense, like "testing" or "continuous integration", then only the "'tis" would be irritating.
Post reply on HN