How is this different than backlift - https://www.backlift.com is already doing the same thing.
Dropbox-Hosted Websites
11–20 of 66 posts
Re: Dropbox-Hosted Websites
#12Re: Dropbox-Hosted Websites
#13So, it saves you the extra click to upload via SFTP? I really am not sure I get the point. Are they targeting people who are confused and befuddled by normal file synchronization?
Re: Dropbox-Hosted Websites
#14How is this different than backlift - https://www.backlift.com is already doing the same thing.
Or http://droppages.com/ or http://www.site44.com/ or http://www.kissr.com/
Re: Dropbox-Hosted Websites
#15So, it saves you the extra click to upload via SFTP? I really am not sure I get the point. Are they targeting people who are confused and befuddled by normal file synchronization?
ie: the majority of computer users?
There's a reason that you see Dropbox peeking out of the system tray of so many business professionals and other non-techies. Why not piggyback off that success?
Re: Dropbox-Hosted Websites
#16Re: Dropbox-Hosted Websites
#17So, it saves you the extra click to upload via SFTP? I really am not sure I get the point. Are they targeting people who are confused and befuddled by normal file synchronization?
http://www.stavros.io/posts/this-blog-is-dropbox-enabled/
http://mirror.stavros.io/posts/this-blog-is-dropbox-enabled/
Re: Dropbox-Hosted Websites
#18The value add on this doesn't seem very high... it can be useful in limited circumstances.
Scenarios where you need extremely simplified website access are unlikely to be those where you need well distributed hosting.
Re: Dropbox-Hosted Websites
#19How is this different than backlift - https://www.backlift.com is already doing the same thing.
Re: Dropbox-Hosted Websites
#20The demo video talks about files being copied to a 'network of servers' to provide load balancing, so does this tool really produce 'Dropbox hosted' websites, or does it just use Dropbox as a mechanism for transferring files between the user and what amounts to a web host? If it's the latter, why even bother with Dropbox as a middle man?
It looks like the main use of Dropbox is just as a mechanism to upload to their service. To be fair, this is a lot easier for an end user to deal with than something like FTP, SFTP, and especially git.
Nothing is more easier than just drag n' drop few files into a folder.
There are tons of static-generators in Ruby/Python/Nodejs/whatever, but none has the simplicity of Dropbox publishing.
Think of it, dropbox as a versioned storage for Markdown source files, third party platform to publish full-fledged rendered HTML with analytics, sitemap, feeds, mobile views, pdf/json/xml formats, etc. This is how should cloud platforms work.
Need collaboration or external contributors? Just invite your friends on Dropbox!