The first example claims that "ui three column grid" is semantic. Not in my book.
Semantic UI – A language for sharing UI
11–20 of 85 posts
Actually, I think we've all misunderstood this: it's "Semantic". Nowhere does it actually claim it's 'semantic' :-)
Re: Semantic UI – A language for sharing UI
#12I wouldn't call writing "ui large red labeled icon button" in HTML semantic anything. I'd called it confusing orgy of style and content.
I don't see any content; those are all stylistic properties.
Re: Semantic UI – A language for sharing UI
#13Why does it do away with using for buttons?
[deleted]
Re: Semantic UI – A language for sharing UI
#14This is actually pretty regressive given the examples. This is the reverse of the attitude that brought us the tag. I disagree that stuff like this should be in classes, so definitely not for me.
Re: Semantic UI – A language for sharing UI
#15Re: Semantic UI – A language for sharing UI
#16I wouldn't call writing "ui large red labeled icon button" in HTML semantic anything. I'd called it confusing orgy of style and content.
Yeah that one was too specific for my liking I don't think you should use colors names like 'red' as a class. What if you decide you don't want it to be red?
Re: Semantic UI – A language for sharing UI
#17What I'd really like is a UI toolkit for developers that goes
Re: Semantic UI – A language for sharing UI
#18I don't what about this is semantic except the class names. But even that comes with a heavy loss in maintainability. If I have to customize say, the border radius of an icon button, I'd have to override this specificity:
`.ui.vertical.labeled.icon.buttons .button:first-child > .icon`
Not cool.
Re: Semantic UI – A language for sharing UI
#19In their examples, none of their buttons were actually buttons. Nor were they even links. They were all DIVs. This is pretty terrible HTML, for many reasons, especially for accessibility.
Re: Semantic UI – A language for sharing UI
#20In their examples, none of their buttons were actually buttons. Nor were they even links. They were all DIVs. This is pretty terrible HTML, for many reasons, especially for accessibility.
It's also the exact opposite of semantic HTML as I understand it.