Live data from Hacker News

Microsoft's Concept Videos From 2000: Why Didn't Ballmer Build Any of It?

bloomberg.com

31–40 of 104 posts

Re: Microsoft's Concept Videos From 2000: Why Didn't Ballmer Build Any of It?

#31
post #7

Ideas are worth nothing. A 15 minute conversation with any expert in HCI 15 years ago would cover 95% of these ideas. Execution is everything. Microsoft tried to execute on some of these ideas, but the result was always too cumbersome/confusing.

"Ideas are worth nothing."

While it is seen here regularly -- and is always strangely given a pass -- this remains the most profoundly meaningless, if not outright stupid, thing that anyone in this industry can mutter.

Re: Microsoft's Concept Videos From 2000: Why Didn't Ballmer Build Any of It?

#33

For the same reason they wont execute anything on that Microsoft 2019 video in 6 years. They'll ride Office to their deathbed, which is coming into clear view. Nice run.

This is how I feel as well. For a while I thought that Windows RT might be their stepping stone into these waters as a sort of clean break from the burden of backwards compatibility of x86 windows, but alas, it seems as though enterprise rules now until 6 feet under.

Re: Microsoft's Concept Videos From 2000: Why Didn't Ballmer Build Any of It?

#34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Part of that is due to the way they do employee reviews. People are rewarded more (in the form of control over their own job, promotions, and bonuses) for building new things in a short time frame than they are for fixing old stuff that's broken or flawed.

are you saying they have too much focus on innovation?

He's confusing Microsoft and Google, it sounds like. At Microsoft you're rewarded primarily for stabbing your co-workers in the back.

Re: Microsoft's Concept Videos From 2000: Why Didn't Ballmer Build Any of It?

#37
post #7

Ideas are worth nothing. A 15 minute conversation with any expert in HCI 15 years ago would cover 95% of these ideas. Execution is everything. Microsoft tried to execute on some of these ideas, but the result was always too cumbersome/confusing.

"Ideas are worth nothing." While it is seen here regularly -- and is always strangely given a pass -- this remains the most profoundly meaningless, if not outright stupid, thing that anyone in this industry can mutter.

I'd have to agree with you. The problem is that good ideas (i.e. groundbreaking,implementable and profitable) are as rare as hen's teeth. Bad and so-so ideas are a dime a dozen.

Re: Microsoft's Concept Videos From 2000: Why Didn't Ballmer Build Any of It?

#38

But they did build a lot of that video. A few things even succesfully, like Lync/Skype (video conferencing) and SharePoint (document sharing) However, they failed at most things: - they were too early and the market and technology was not ready for it (Pocket PC) - they were too late (Zune, Windows Phone) - plans were blocked by companies who's support they needed but who were scared of them (music/movies/mobile phon…

SharePoint is not a successful product!! It is very frustrating to run Sharepoint as anything it is marketing for.

Document sharing - bad execution, horrible UI. Something that should take 2 clicks takes about 8 clicks on Sharepoint.

Sharepoint as a Website - don't even get me started with that. Unless you want to spend 3 months hiring a 3rd party sharepoint company to implement 3rd party tools to make it half usable, you are out of luck.

Re: Microsoft's Concept Videos From 2000: Why Didn't Ballmer Build Any of It?

#39
post #7

Ideas are worth nothing. A 15 minute conversation with any expert in HCI 15 years ago would cover 95% of these ideas. Execution is everything. Microsoft tried to execute on some of these ideas, but the result was always too cumbersome/confusing.

"Ideas are worth nothing." While it is seen here regularly -- and is always strangely given a pass -- this remains the most profoundly meaningless, if not outright stupid, thing that anyone in this industry can mutter.

That is because the phrase is typically given in response to the self-proclaimed "big-idea business guy" who is pitching his idea to somebody that he expects to 1) implement it, 2) grovel at his feet for being given the great opportunity of implementing it.

Not terribly applicable here... but at the same time not terribly irrelevant here either.

Re: Microsoft's Concept Videos From 2000: Why Didn't Ballmer Build Any of It?

#40
post #7

Ideas are worth nothing. A 15 minute conversation with any expert in HCI 15 years ago would cover 95% of these ideas. Execution is everything. Microsoft tried to execute on some of these ideas, but the result was always too cumbersome/confusing.

"Ideas are worth nothing." While it is seen here regularly -- and is always strangely given a pass -- this remains the most profoundly meaningless, if not outright stupid, thing that anyone in this industry can mutter.

I wholeheartedly agree. If this were true, we wouldn't need a patent system.
Post reply on HN