Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Server under heavy load. Any downside to this hack?

news.ycombinator.com

1–10 of 32 posts

Ask HN: Server under heavy load. Any downside to this hack?

#1
The server hosting one of our live apps is under high loads and gets into a state where it stops responding to http requests several times a day. These outages last typically anywhere from a few minutes all the way up to half an hour or so.

The major culprit here is MySQL load and we've been working on optimizing this (those interested can refer to my previous thread on this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6348903).

For now we've found that restarting the httpd and mysqld services brings things back to normal almost immediately.

While we continue to work on a - more elegant - solution, we're thinking of writing a bash/shell script that runs on hourly cron, checks load average (via uptime or /proc/loadavg) and if found higher than a threshold, restarts the services.

Can anyone think of any downside to this (used at least as a temporary measure)?

Re: Ask HN: Server under heavy load. Any downside to this hack?

#4
I would be really worried about losing requests in-flight or that take a long time to run.

Is it prohibitively expensive/time consuming to get (or borrow) a bigger machine (on EC2, or in your colo, or what have you) to run MySQL on until you've figured out how to shard / scale out your application?

Re: Ask HN: Server under heavy load. Any downside to this hack?

#5
post #4

I would be really worried about losing requests in-flight or that take a long time to run. Is it prohibitively expensive/time consuming to get (or borrow) a bigger machine (on EC2, or in your colo, or what have you) to run MySQL on until you've figured out how to shard / scale out your application?

We are actually more than worried too, because we _know_ we're losing plenty of requests daily so trying to cut down the losses temporarily while we figure out a more long-term solution.

For the rest, this thread might give you some more info on the issue: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6348903

Re: Ask HN: Server under heavy load. Any downside to this hack?

#6
> For now we've found that restarting the httpd and mysqld services brings things back to normal almost immediately.

You need to examine the restart process and analyze why it resolves the issue. If the reason is the abandonment of dead parasitic processes and memory leaks, you need to find out why and correct them. If the reason is that the restart unceremoniously drops all the current transactions, you need to increase capacity.

> Can anyone think of any downside to this (used at least as a temporary measure)?

I certainly can -- a bunch of really irritated visitors, whose transactions are abandoned. But that's only true if that is actually what's going on. Make sure you don't have software issues that are preventing efficient operation. If that's not the issue, you need to grow with your customer base -- increase server capacity.

Re: Ask HN: Server under heavy load. Any downside to this hack?

#7
post #6

> For now we've found that restarting the httpd and mysqld services brings things back to normal almost immediately. You need to examine the restart process and analyze why it resolves the issue. If the reason is the abandonment of dead parasitic processes and memory leaks, you need to find out why and correct them. If the reason is that the restart unceremoniously drops all the current transactions, you need to incr…

>You need to examine the restart process and analyze

Like I said in OP, we've identified MySQL to be the primary bottleneck and are already working on resolving this.

>whose transactions are abandoned.

At least some saving grace here... we're not selling anything... it is purely a content site

Thanks for your input.

Re: Ask HN: Server under heavy load. Any downside to this hack?

#8
post #7
post #6

> For now we've found that restarting the httpd and mysqld services brings things back to normal almost immediately. You need to examine the restart process and analyze why it resolves the issue. If the reason is the abandonment of dead parasitic processes and memory leaks, you need to find out why and correct them. If the reason is that the restart unceremoniously drops all the current transactions, you need to incr…

>You need to examine the restart process and analyze Like I said in OP, we've identified MySQL to be the primary bottleneck and are already working on resolving this. >whose transactions are abandoned. At least some saving grace here... we're not selling anything... it is purely a content site Thanks for your input.

>Like I said in OP, we've identified MySQL to be the primary bottleneck and are already working on resolving this.

Ah, yes. I remember from your prior post that you have very large databases and table sizes and are considering (or have begun) partitioning the largest tables. It turns out there is an innate partitioning scheme built into the most recent MySQL versions, but it has to be compiled into the running binary by way of a compiler flag:

http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/partitioning.html

I apologize if you've already heard this, or if it's already in place as a partial solution.

Re: Ask HN: Server under heavy load. Any downside to this hack?

#9
I've had load issues in Postgres, not MySQL before and it was due to autovacuum running on tables getting updated/inserted frequently. I'm not sure what the equivalent in MySQL is, but if you have a ton of insert/update queries, consider archiving your tables after a certain period of time, so that your main table doesn't have ton of rows. You can consider sharding of course, but also consider sharding the actual tables in the same database. An insert query on a table with 1000 rows will take much much less time than an insert query on a table with 100 million rows, all things considered.

Also, consider creating a buffer in the application layer that buffers inserts/updates and executes them once as a single transaction, if they don't need to be executed immediately. It puts less stress on the database. Of course, this would require a lot of rewriting in your app, so not sure if you want to go through this route.

Indices are another area. I'm sure plenty of people have told you to optimize your indices, but also consider REMOVING unnecessary indices. Do you have an index on a text column, or multiple varchar columns? Those can be killer after awhile because inserts will slow down. Consider changing indices on varchar columns to indices on an int column by hashing those strings.

A quick suggestion: Install NewRelic (it's free for a certain period), and check out the database transactions that are taking up the most CPU load. Sometimes there's that 1 query you overlooked that is table scanning and could be the main culprit.

Also, are you using Rails by any chance? If so, there are other areas I can suggest.

And please post your server specs. Maybe your VPS just does suck (no offense), and the easiest route is just to upgrade your server.

Re: Ask HN: Server under heavy load. Any downside to this hack?

#10
Restarting the processes isn't really solving the problem. What is the actual bottleneck? It should be possible to figure this out.

I think your first problem is that you are using a VPS. You should never use a VPS in a high load situation like this - buy a dedicated server! They only cost about $70/month, which you should be able to afford if you have a successful site. Ideally you should get as much RAM as you can afford and/or an SSD drive.

I know you said you didn't want to throw hardware at the problem, but there are limits - you can't run a massive database on crappy hardware and expect it to work smoothly.

Post reply on HN