US Budget Visualization Using d3
21–30 of 53 posts
Re: US Budget Visualization Using d3
#22Compare with the 2001-2002 tech bust, for example.
Re: US Budget Visualization Using d3
#23It's pretty shocking how much more expensive Federal unemployment benefits have been for this most recent recession, assuming that's what's responsible for the massive spike in the Department of Labor's budget. Compare with the 2001-2002 tech bust, for example.
http://stateofworkingamerica.org/charts/drop-in-employment-d...
I assume that as unemployment benefits drop, these people will begin to move into homelessness.
Re: US Budget Visualization Using d3
#24It makes it impossible to compare values in any meaningful sense - either in a relative growth, or the size of the budget as a whole. The animation serves no purpose, other than to make the user wait a few seconds between switching years.
Re: US Budget Visualization Using d3
#25This is not a very good visualization. It makes it impossible to compare values in any meaningful sense - either in a relative growth, or the size of the budget as a whole. The animation serves no purpose, other than to make the user wait a few seconds between switching years.
Edit: That said, to say something nice, the animation is technically done very well.
Re: US Budget Visualization Using d3
#26Why does it resort and regrow all the blocks when you switch between years or other settings? If the same blocks simply grew or shrunk, it would be a lot easier to follow the difference. Actually, it sometimes simply converts blocks into others - switching between 2012 and 2013, the "Justice" block morphs into the "National Infrastructure Bank" block. Very confusing.
this is because some blocks are added and removed from year to year. In this type of visualization, it's impossible to keep things the same size and position while also changing the amounts. The best way to use this isn't to switch between years. If you click on any cell, you can see a graph of how that changes over time. If you double click on any of the cells, you can see a new visualization of everything that make…
Re: US Budget Visualization Using d3
#27This is not a very good visualization. It makes it impossible to compare values in any meaningful sense - either in a relative growth, or the size of the budget as a whole. The animation serves no purpose, other than to make the user wait a few seconds between switching years.
For example, you can see that in 2012 that 2.89% of the budget went to education, but if you double click, you can see that only 13.73% of that went to elementary and secondary education.
You can also single click anywhere and see a graph of how things have changed over time. So you can see that in 2009 there was a huge spike in elementary and secondary education, and you can go to 2009 to further investigate, and find there was a "State Fiscal Stabilization Fund" in 2009 that sent $14 billion to education, and then went away.
I think another visualization comparing departments would be pretty cool, and might build that one next.
Re: US Budget Visualization Using d3
#28Re: US Budget Visualization Using d3
#29NYT has a 2013 budget proposal visualization in d3, made I believe by Mike Bostock himself: http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/02/13/us/politics/20...
Re: US Budget Visualization Using d3
#30Why does it resort and regrow all the blocks when you switch between years or other settings? If the same blocks simply grew or shrunk, it would be a lot easier to follow the difference. Actually, it sometimes simply converts blocks into others - switching between 2012 and 2013, the "Justice" block morphs into the "National Infrastructure Bank" block. Very confusing.
I agree with you, maybe this could help the author: http://bost.ocks.org/mike/constancy/