Live data from Hacker News

'Titstare' app at TechCrunch: women in tech deserve better

theguardian.com

121–130 of 168 posts

Re: 'Titstare' app at TechCrunch: women in tech deserve better

#121

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Did I indicate anywhere that some people don't have the opposite, poorly formed opinion? I don't give a shit. If they try censorship, I say offend them even more until THEY accept that not everyone agrees with them.

> Did I indicate anywhere that some people don't have the opposite, poorly formed opinion? I think that we can agree that there are poorly formed opinions on display here. > I say offend them even more until THEY accept that not everyone agrees with them. Someone's throwing their toys around today.

But can you agree that these people complaining about tit jokes are not accepting many other people's opinion that tit jokes are funny and that people should be free to joke about them if they wish?

> Someone's throwing their toys around today?

How so? By pointing out your illogical stance?

Re: 'Titstare' app at TechCrunch: women in tech deserve better

#122
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Feminism is about the equality of opportunity and power . You cannot create a picture of equal sexism by demonstrating a low-power, low-economic status, low opportunity-of-career-advancement role (that has traditionally been a female-only occupation due in-part to traditional gender-specific roles around child-rearing) where men who choose to enter it are viewed with scepticism. Especially if that role includes close…

Do you realize that preventing someone from getting a job because "has traditionally been a female-only occupation due in-part to traditional gender-specific roles around child-rearing" and that "men who choose to enter it are viewed with scepticism" is the very definition of sexism? Sexism isn't about the industry or about career advancement is about discrimination against a gender for a given category of jobs.

Show me proof of prevention.

You are confusing cause and effect.

You are concentrating on a tiny percentage of evidence in the counter direction hugely outbalanced by the weight of evidence in the main direction.

Sexism is a huge problem for women and a tiny problem for men. So small, in fact, it statistically it does not exist.

Look at the balance of the scales not the tiny fleck on one side.

Sexism is about balance not uniformity. It is about power and opportunity. Not everything has to be equal for us to eradicate it.

As long as the problem is stacked against women we should be concentrating on sexism against women.

Re: 'Titstare' app at TechCrunch: women in tech deserve better

#123

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A devil's advocate expresses a point of view. Specifically, they express a point of view that they do not agree with.

It's more than that. Playing devil's advocate means you're expressing the opposite point of view when you don't really hold that point of view, but you're doing it to prove a point.

Indeed. jnardiello was asked if that is what they were doing, or if they genuinely hold that view; and they haven't given a definitive answer.

Re: 'Titstare' app at TechCrunch: women in tech deserve better

#124

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nowhere did I say that I "know what the whole group of Women is thinking". It's a bit ironic that you precede that with "Women find tit jokes funny" which could be interpreted as you saying that you in fact do know. But I do know for a fact that some women, in fact some people do not find them funny. Which is what I did say.

So then what's your point? Don't joke about anything that anybody could possibly get offended at?

That would be ideal, yes. But you could start with avoiding predictable offence to large percentage of people.

Re: 'Titstare' app at TechCrunch: women in tech deserve better

#125

This was both a massive waste of time and effort. A truly interesting app would be one that measures facial symmetry. Humans tend to appreciate symmetrical features, same length of arms, legs, eye alignment, etc. I can see where this too could be abused, sadly. But at least it would have a marginally better chance to have a market. And it would provide a interesting technical challenge.

While I agree with your point, I don't see how being physically attracted to a person's symmetry is any different than being attracted to the dimensions of their hips or the size of their breasts other than being more presentable to an audience. It would be more sensible from the standpoint of the presentation, but any of those people pitchforking over focusing on physical attraction to physical attributes of human beings in this thread would have to maintain the same incredulity over one measuring each body part for symmetry.

Re: 'Titstare' app at TechCrunch: women in tech deserve better

#126

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Did I indicate anywhere that some people don't have the opposite, poorly formed opinion? I think that we can agree that there are poorly formed opinions on display here. > I say offend them even more until THEY accept that not everyone agrees with them. Someone's throwing their toys around today.

But can you agree that these people complaining about tit jokes are not accepting many other people's opinion that tit jokes are funny and that people should be free to joke about them if they wish? > Someone's throwing their toys around today? How so? By pointing out your illogical stance?

> But can you agree that these people complaining about tit jokes are not accepting many other people's opinion that tit jokes are funny and that people should be free to joke about them if they wish?

Hell no. This is standard derailing junk. It goes "my freedom to be an arsehole and drive people away is just as important as other people's desire to work in an arsehole-free environment." It's childish and inconsiderate.

> How so?

I leave it to you to work out what the petulant part of "I say offend them even more" is.

Re: 'Titstare' app at TechCrunch: women in tech deserve better

#127

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So then what's your point? Don't joke about anything that anybody could possibly get offended at?

That would be ideal, yes. But you could start with avoiding predictable offence to large percentage of people .

Please prove to me that the majority of women or even a large portion are offended. Nobody has done that yet.

Furthermore, even if you could prove that - percentage has nothing to do with it. That is a completely arbitrary qualifier. Offending people is a birth given right. Get over it.

Re: 'Titstare' app at TechCrunch: women in tech deserve better

#128
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Feminism is about the equality of opportunity and power . You cannot create a picture of equal sexism by demonstrating a low-power, low-economic status, low opportunity-of-career-advancement role (that has traditionally been a female-only occupation due in-part to traditional gender-specific roles around child-rearing) where men who choose to enter it are viewed with scepticism. Especially if that role includes close…

"Sexism is a female only problem and will continue to be as long as men hold most of the power and are afforded most of the best opportunities." Can you name one company who wouldn't take a more competent female developer over a male developer?

I have worked for many.

How many female developers does your company have?

Mine has 0/6. My previous company, that actively sought female developers had around 15%, the company before that had 3 out of 100+, before that one out of 30.

Women make up 51% of the population and, at least in the UK, are getting better school results in science & maths than men.

And yet what percentage of the developer population is female? 10%? more? less?

So it looks like either the companies are not taking the more competent developers or the women are less competent.

Are you therefore claiming that female developers are less competent than male developers?

Re: 'Titstare' app at TechCrunch: women in tech deserve better

#129

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have no idea what you are talking about.

You said "One other part of sexism is sexual objectification, which reduces the person or whole gender to an instrument of sexual pleasure." And I said that nobody was reduced to being just a sexual object.

The screen literally just had tits. The whole point of the app was to look at tits. There was nothing else of a woman involved. They really did just take the "tits" part and exclude the rest!

Re: 'Titstare' app at TechCrunch: women in tech deserve better

#130

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That would be ideal, yes. But you could start with avoiding predictable offence to large percentage of people .

Please prove to me that the majority of women or even a large portion are offended. Nobody has done that yet. Furthermore, even if you could prove that - percentage has nothing to do with it. That is a completely arbitrary qualifier. Offending people is a birth given right. Get over it.

Now you're just trolling. Given the response that occurred in the media and in general, I suggest that you prove the opposite.
Post reply on HN