Progressive Enhancement Is Dead

Post by gnaritas » Thu, Sep 05, 2013, 7:06 PM UTC

asdasf wrote: post #260

gnaritas wrote: post #259

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I am denying it right now, that is the whole point. Server side templates with simple javascript enhancement has been much faster for us, and much easier to maintain. I simply don't believe you. It's a fact that it's more work to support both AJAX interactions and work with js disabled than it is to support just AJAX alone. There is no arguing this, it's more work to support 2 modes of interaction than it is to sup…

HN is not the venue for that kind of garbage. Your personal experiences and biases are not universal objective truths. Grow up.

Post by gnaritas » Thu, Sep 05, 2013, 10:30 PM UTC

asdasf wrote: post #262

gnaritas wrote: post #261

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I require no lecture about HN from you, I've been here since the beginning. I listed facts not personal experiences and I'm sorry you can't handle that and resort to lying.

> It's a fact that it's more work to support both AJAX interactions and work with js disabled than it is to support just AJAX alone That is not a fact. It may well be your experience from the way your applications were written, but it is not a fact. You clearly do need a lecture, or you wouldn't be posting garbage.