Live data from Hacker News

Amazon ElastiCache - Now With a Dash of Redis

aws.typepad.com

11–20 of 42 posts

Re: Amazon ElastiCache - Now With a Dash of Redis

#11
post #6
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We just spent days moving stuff away from Elasticache due to memcached limitations, and would love to have moved to managed Redis. We're an AWS partner, with the highest level support contract and if we'd known two weeks ago that this was in the pipeline, we would have waited. AWS, why don't you give us any road map for stuff like this?

yeah we recently migrated from memcached on elasticache to redis on EC2 (and bought the reservations), though our migration rolled out about 4-6 weeks ago. oh well, I guess.

I get the impression that Amazon are deathly afraid of causing an Osborne effect.

Re: Amazon ElastiCache - Now With a Dash of Redis

#13
post #3
post #2

It was only a matter of time before they added Redis to the mix. Glad to see it happening sooner rather than later though.

We just spent days moving stuff away from Elasticache due to memcached limitations, and would love to have moved to managed Redis. We're an AWS partner, with the highest level support contract and if we'd known two weeks ago that this was in the pipeline, we would have waited. AWS, why don't you give us any road map for stuff like this?

If you reach out to AWS people, you may get some of this information before it goes public. AWS likes to do private (NDA'd) beta tests of new products with AWS-heavy customers. They work off of the feedback while bigger customers get their needs satisfied.

Re: Amazon ElastiCache - Now With a Dash of Redis

#14
Based on a personal experience, I found that setting up a dedicated machine is way cheaper than using those services.

I ended up replacing the following:

- Mongodb on a EC2 instance instead of Dynamodb

- EC2 Mysql instance instead of RDS

- Redis instance instead of Elastic Cache

- Solr on EC2 instead of Cloud Search

- FFmpeg instance instead of Elastic transcoder

Re: Amazon ElastiCache - Now With a Dash of Redis

#15

Of all the things that you can put to the cloud, I'm not sure why people would want a cloud-hosted memory store. It's easy as heck to set it up in your own server, probably costs less to maintain and host, and faster too as it's closer to your data centers.

They handle automatic failover, which redis does not currently do out of the box. That part is pretty cool. Maybe not worth the price, but definitely useful.

Re: Amazon ElastiCache - Now With a Dash of Redis

#16
post #14

Based on a personal experience, I found that setting up a dedicated machine is way cheaper than using those services. I ended up replacing the following: - Mongodb on a EC2 instance instead of Dynamodb - EC2 Mysql instance instead of RDS - Redis instance instead of Elastic Cache - Solr on EC2 instead of Cloud Search - FFmpeg instance instead of Elastic transcoder

At scale this is probably cheaper, if your a startup trying to scale, probably not.

Re: Amazon ElastiCache - Now With a Dash of Redis

#17

Of all the things that you can put to the cloud, I'm not sure why people would want a cloud-hosted memory store. It's easy as heck to set it up in your own server, probably costs less to maintain and host, and faster too as it's closer to your data centers.

If you're using other AWS services, then this makes a lot of sense. It saves you the hassle of setting multiple redis nodes on EC2 and the (admittedly low) maintenance. I think it's a good move on their part.

[deleted]

Re: Amazon ElastiCache - Now With a Dash of Redis

#18
post #3
post #2

It was only a matter of time before they added Redis to the mix. Glad to see it happening sooner rather than later though.

We just spent days moving stuff away from Elasticache due to memcached limitations, and would love to have moved to managed Redis. We're an AWS partner, with the highest level support contract and if we'd known two weeks ago that this was in the pipeline, we would have waited. AWS, why don't you give us any road map for stuff like this?

we asked and they hinted a few months ago.

Re: Amazon ElastiCache - Now With a Dash of Redis

#19
post #4

So, how does ElastiCache fare compared to all the hosted Redis-as-a-service (or Redis-as-a-PaaS-addon) products?

Well unless you roll with a Micro instance (213mb of RAM and dismal performance), the price for a Small on-demand instance (1.3GB memory) is ~$54 per month. You save quite a bit by going with a reserved instance, where you pay about $70 up-front but then your monthly instance price is almost halved, coming in at around $32 per/mo. Either way, it's going to be more cost-effective at a lower level to go with something…

The prices of many Redis-Service-Provider will drop rapidly after amazons release ?

Re: Amazon ElastiCache - Now With a Dash of Redis

#20
post #14

Based on a personal experience, I found that setting up a dedicated machine is way cheaper than using those services. I ended up replacing the following: - Mongodb on a EC2 instance instead of Dynamodb - EC2 Mysql instance instead of RDS - Redis instance instead of Elastic Cache - Solr on EC2 instead of Cloud Search - FFmpeg instance instead of Elastic transcoder

why even use EC2 then? It would be much cheaper to use any other hosting provider.
Post reply on HN