Live data from Hacker News

Buildbox: A Hosted CI service that uses your own infrastructure to run builds

buildbox.io

11–20 of 33 posts

Re: Buildbox: A Hosted CI service that uses your own infrastructure to run builds

#11
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hi RossM, Keith from Buildbox here. Can you see https://assets.buildbox.io/assets/logo-2e6cfd9ad9b7c91ffe1e5... . It's working ok for me... Weird.

I'm getting an access denied error on the asset link, but the page seems to load fine for me.

That link is literally ending with '...', not cut off by HN or anything.

Re: Buildbox: A Hosted CI service that uses your own infrastructure to run builds

#14
post #8

Would be nice if the page explained how Buildbox compares with other popular hosted CI tools, e.g. Jenkins ( http://jenkins-ci.org )?

Any thoughts on how this compares to CircleCI (https://circleci.com - I'm a founder btw)?

Re: Buildbox: A Hosted CI service that uses your own infrastructure to run builds

#15
Is it just me, or has the entire Open Source/Free Software movement(s) been replaced by simple proprietary tools "in beta" pushed by profiteering young coders looking to start a micro-business oriented towards their peers? The great majority of these tools could be [and often are] written in a weekend, which is why it confuses me they'd be trying to sell it to someone.

As soon as I see a shiny, polished web page with lots of highlights and no details, I now assume it's a shill for money without any meaningful content. I'm right more often than not. Oh, startup culture!

Re: Buildbox: A Hosted CI service that uses your own infrastructure to run builds

#18

Is it just me, or has the entire Open Source/Free Software movement(s) been replaced by simple proprietary tools "in beta" pushed by profiteering young coders looking to start a micro-business oriented towards their peers? The great majority of these tools could be [and often are] written in a weekend, which is why it confuses me they'd be trying to sell it to someone. As soon as I see a shiny, polished web page with…

There is room for both.

There are open source alternatives to this service, which a couple of folks on this thread have already pointed out.

However, not all teams are scaled to run and maintain a Jenkins server so there is certainly a need for such services. Often the price point is low enough that I am happy to get myself out of the business of maintaining infrastructure so that I can focus on the product I'm building.

Re: Buildbox: A Hosted CI service that uses your own infrastructure to run builds

#19

Is it just me, or has the entire Open Source/Free Software movement(s) been replaced by simple proprietary tools "in beta" pushed by profiteering young coders looking to start a micro-business oriented towards their peers? The great majority of these tools could be [and often are] written in a weekend, which is why it confuses me they'd be trying to sell it to someone. As soon as I see a shiny, polished web page with…

I could be wrong, but from where I'm standing, it's just you.

Most major web applications built today thrive on a large, active ecosystem of open-source tools. Rails, Django, Play and Compojure all require the active participation of a large community of interested developers to keep them thriving and healthy. The author of the linked tool, who is a good dude, himself has a notable open source track record. I don't see any of this going away anytime soon.

I used to maintain the Ruby version of CruiseControl, the original open-source CI tool. There's plenty of room for everyone here.

Re: Buildbox: A Hosted CI service that uses your own infrastructure to run builds

#20
If I understand the offering, this is great. The differentiator seems to be the ability to use your current deployment tool to set up the test environment, meaning it's a lot closer to your real production environment.

I recently spent a reasonable amount of time looking for a hosted CI solution that would run the particular version of postgis we use, rather than the 'latest and greatest,' but it seems like a lot of the current offerings have fairly limited flexibility in build environments (understandably I suppose.)

Post reply on HN