New Snowden Leak Reports 'Groundbreaking' NSA Crypto-Cracking
11–20 of 122 posts
Re: New Snowden Leak Reports 'Groundbreaking' NSA Crypto-Cracking
#12:( up until just a few years ago, I always looked at the NSA organization with a sense of awe and pride ... that we (the US) were so advanced. Now it's just a source of shame that such powerful knowledge is being directed at us, rather than used as a tool for our benefit.
It's the thought that counts, right?
Re: New Snowden Leak Reports 'Groundbreaking' NSA Crypto-Cracking
#13Re: New Snowden Leak Reports 'Groundbreaking' NSA Crypto-Cracking
#14Re: New Snowden Leak Reports 'Groundbreaking' NSA Crypto-Cracking
#15GS pay tops out around $117k. Is that how much we're paying for top level cryptography research? Do contractors like Snowden get to make $200k because that's just what their consulting firm bills for?
Re: New Snowden Leak Reports 'Groundbreaking' NSA Crypto-Cracking
#16I think observers have long assumed NSA is some number of years ahead – say, 2-30 years ahead – of openly published results in cryptanalysis and cryptosystem vulnerabilities.
I think we put too much emphasis on the single data point of GCHQ inventing pgp early (IIRC)
Re: New Snowden Leak Reports 'Groundbreaking' NSA Crypto-Cracking
#17Re: New Snowden Leak Reports 'Groundbreaking' NSA Crypto-Cracking
#18> The Post said it withheld the rest, and kept some information out of its reporting, in consultation with the Obama administration to protect U.S. intelligence sources and methods. Weird. Why now? They (admin) refused to do that with WikiLeaks.
Re: New Snowden Leak Reports 'Groundbreaking' NSA Crypto-Cracking
#19Mostly I'm surprised at the pay distribution on page 9 of the included document. GS pay tops out around $117k. Is that how much we're paying for top level cryptography research? Do contractors like Snowden get to make $200k because that's just what their consulting firm bills for?
Re: New Snowden Leak Reports 'Groundbreaking' NSA Crypto-Cracking
#20I wonder why do newspapers insist on labelling Snowden a 'leaker'. Why not 'whistleblower', or 'privacy advocate'?