Live data from Hacker News

Facebook kills startups with new collaborative photo album feature

venturebeat.com

31–40 of 50 posts

Re: Facebook kills startups with new collaborative photo album feature

#31

Just in case you didn't trust your photos/albums/comments with Facebook (or Google), you could try a privacy respecting, user-owned, self-hosted solution (self-hosting coming soon): Demo: https://rrc.imp.blib.us/link/album/private?albumid=117bc3 Password: 1234 If you wanted your own: https://register.blib.us

Chrome screams out an https error on the first link.

Re: Facebook kills startups with new collaborative photo album feature

#32
post #6
post #5

Link bait-y title. > But we’re deadpooling all of ‘em, effective immediately. I really don't like the tone of many parts of this article. > Facebook is just too big to fail when it comes to normal people and photos. The same could have been said about places.

> I really don't like the tone of many parts of this article. "Again and again, we warned y’all that Facebook, owner of all photos of people on the Internet and the most popular mobile photo app, was going to crush you eventually." It really boggles the mind.

Are you kidding? This is fucking hilarious.

Re: Facebook kills startups with new collaborative photo album feature

#33
post #27
post #19

"Apps and services like Cluster, Albumatic, Keepsy, Swirl, Flock, Kicksend, Kaptur, and dozens of others are destined for the dustbin of Internet history." I suspect most of these were headed there anyway, no offense to anyone working on them.

As someone who isn't doing web programming, this "app culture" is grinding my gears. I respect a fellow coder's work. I'm sure a lot of hard work went into all those applications listed there (of which, frankly, I haven't heard, because if I want to share something with my friends I upload it on my server and be done with it), but people ought to be more aware of their own smallness. You don't base your enterprise on…

though it is easy to create such a service, sometimes big companies just don't mess too much with things that are working just well and there is a room for niche products. still, it is very risky to offer a products only to someone else's users - you are out at the moment that the big company decides to implement the feature you are offering.

technically, yahoo,google and microsoft(icq,myspace,friendter too) had all the resources to create most of the now popular online services like insagram, facebook, tumblr but they did not and now are buying these or compete with them fruitlessly.

couldn't facebook create an app with filters? yes, but they bought instagram because of the userbase. so I agree with you that these are bad investments but only when the projects don't have something that could not be recreated with few engineers.

Re: Facebook kills startups with new collaborative photo album feature

#34
post #31

Just in case you didn't trust your photos/albums/comments with Facebook (or Google), you could try a privacy respecting, user-owned, self-hosted solution (self-hosting coming soon): Demo: https://rrc.imp.blib.us/link/album/private?albumid=117bc3 Password: 1234 If you wanted your own: https://register.blib.us

Chrome screams out an https error on the first link.

[deleted]

Re: Facebook kills startups with new collaborative photo album feature

#35
I see a market for photo app customer that don't have Facebook accounts and don't trust Facebook.

This article is both hyperbolic and patronizing.

If the article stated, "don't bother building another OS, Microsoft have that market sewn up", I think we would all equally call bullshit.

Re: Facebook kills startups with new collaborative photo album feature

#36
post #31

Just in case you didn't trust your photos/albums/comments with Facebook (or Google), you could try a privacy respecting, user-owned, self-hosted solution (self-hosting coming soon): Demo: https://rrc.imp.blib.us/link/album/private?albumid=117bc3 Password: 1234 If you wanted your own: https://register.blib.us

Chrome screams out an https error on the first link.

Are you talking about the certificate problem or a DNS error. If its a certificate problem, its because each user in our system generates their own self-signed certificates. If it was an actual error - Some windows/DNS servers query "AAAA" records currently which gets our DNS server code in trouble - hopefully we can fix this soon.

Re: Facebook kills startups with new collaborative photo album feature

#37

Just in case you didn't trust your photos/albums/comments with Facebook (or Google), you could try a privacy respecting, user-owned, self-hosted solution (self-hosting coming soon): Demo: https://rrc.imp.blib.us/link/album/private?albumid=117bc3 Password: 1234 If you wanted your own: https://register.blib.us

Were you having a competition to see how many different fonts you could get on the front page? /snarc

Re: Facebook kills startups with new collaborative photo album feature

#38
I have just one question for everyone: Would you guys use something like [HashPix][1] instead, if it were made available as an alternative?

If not, I'll stop working on/maintaining it and devote my time to other pursuits - preferably ones that might bring in some money eventually.

PS: It is currently running on a Heroku instance because I can't afford to 'launch' it yet. :(

[1]: http://hashpix.herokuapp.com

Re: Facebook kills startups with new collaborative photo album feature

#39
post #5

Link bait-y title. > But we’re deadpooling all of ‘em, effective immediately. I really don't like the tone of many parts of this article. > Facebook is just too big to fail when it comes to normal people and photos. The same could have been said about places.

What do you mean "The same could have been said about places" - are you referring to foursquare's dominance of the places market?

Re: Facebook kills startups with new collaborative photo album feature

#40
post #27
post #19

"Apps and services like Cluster, Albumatic, Keepsy, Swirl, Flock, Kicksend, Kaptur, and dozens of others are destined for the dustbin of Internet history." I suspect most of these were headed there anyway, no offense to anyone working on them.

As someone who isn't doing web programming, this "app culture" is grinding my gears. I respect a fellow coder's work. I'm sure a lot of hard work went into all those applications listed there (of which, frankly, I haven't heard, because if I want to share something with my friends I upload it on my server and be done with it), but people ought to be more aware of their own smallness. You don't base your enterprise on…

Instagram began as a photosharing app when Facebook already dominated photosharing.
Post reply on HN