Live data from Hacker News

Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer to retire within 12 months

microsoft.com

131–140 of 784 posts

Re: Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer to retire within 12 months

#131

Let me tell you an anecdote why I think Ballmer was incompetent and largely responsible for the sorry state that Microsoft is in at the moment. Yesterday there was a long article in the Israeli newspaper Globes about the success of the Israeli adware companies. Israel has in recent years become a world leader in software that installs unwanted toolbars on your elderly dad and mom's PC and "monetizes" them until they…

Israeli? That seems strange ... I don't want to name regions, but you've got your geography wrong if you think they're the worst.

Re: Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer to retire within 12 months

#133

What were the key Ballmer era highlights? == Negatives == * Clashes with Gates during CEO transition of power: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121261241035146237.html * Developer relations / motivational speaking (thanks mathattack): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvsboPUjrGc * Employee retention (thanks JonnieCache, Ziomislaw): http://www.smh.com.au/news/technology/microsoft-ceo-im-going... * Windows Phone: http://…

Here's the key Ballmer era highlight

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvsboPUjrGc

Re: Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer to retire within 12 months

#134
post #78
post #33

Since the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has a huge percentage of its wealth still in MSFT stock, I think Bill Gates can make a case to himself that picking the best possible leader for MSFT will save hundreds of thousands of marginal children. If I were him, there would be two candidates: Qi Lu (insider, obvious choice), or, for the ultimate in turnaround ballerdom: Ben Horowitz (from a16z). Either would be a vas…

i wonder if they are going to try and preserve the multi-headed monster that is microsoft today, or whether they are going to break it up into constituent parts. i know that the temptation is great to try and compete head to head with google on the plan to totally annihilate each other, but i wonder if that makes any sense. google docs has been around for six years and i've never encountered it in a corporate setting…

"google docs has been around for six years and i've never encountered it in a corporate setting"

Dallas Independent School District uses it.

Re: Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer to retire within 12 months

#135
post #99

Earlier quoted context omitted.

To be fair, one of the greatest "see the future" CEOs has said similar things. Just off the top of my head, I know that Steve Jobs said that no one would want a larger screen than the original iPhone had, and he said that 7" tablets didn't make any sense. Now Apple has a larger iPhone screen and 7" tablet. That's not to say that Steve Jobs was wrong about the future, but he had to sell devices in the present which me…

Also don't forget Apple has had it's share of failures under Jobs (MobileMe, arguably AppleTV, their desktop peripherals always sucked, plenty of failed products, etc.).

I'm still pissed off about my Newton...

Re: Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer to retire within 12 months

#136

Let me tell you an anecdote why I think Ballmer was incompetent and largely responsible for the sorry state that Microsoft is in at the moment. Yesterday there was a long article in the Israeli newspaper Globes about the success of the Israeli adware companies. Israel has in recent years become a world leader in software that installs unwanted toolbars on your elderly dad and mom's PC and "monetizes" them until they…

Can you provide the source about the part " Microsoft actually has affiliate agreements with these companies to take a slice of the profits"?

Citation needed. Sounds like more FUD.

Re: Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer to retire within 12 months

#138
post #109

Huge news! Let's see what happens to the stock today. It edged up a little at the end of the day, suggesting that perhaps news was getting out. It's up 8% in premarket trading. [1] One interesting thing to note from that chart is their Beta (a measure of link to market volatility) is less than 1, which is very low for a high tech stock. It basically means that the market views them as less volatile to market conditio…

Thank God. (Speaking as an ex-Microsoftie). Hopefully MS will lose the "we need to put Windows on everything, including embedded systems" attitude. Windows is a horrible bloated mess barely capable of successfully running on a tablet PC, much less smaller things. (And if you've ever had to /build/ Windows . . . OMG. OMFG). There are core bits of Windows that are great; the I/O system is incredibly well done. Then the…

But what could be the future of MS look like a strategic perspective? I am pondering a bit about that. They are somewhat squeezed in between closed system and open source. How can they position themselves for a solid path for the future in that middle-ground.

Re: Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer to retire within 12 months

#139

Earlier quoted context omitted.

People often point to MS's continued profitability in these discussions, but they're missing the point. The question isn't whether they're profitable today , but whether they're profitable and relevant in ten or twenty years. Profits are a lagging indicator for a once-successful company. A large company with entrenched products can coast for a long time while in decline. For example, RIM basically sank in 2007-2008.…

Though I agree with you mostly, I argue that Xbox and Kinect have greatly contributed to their profits.

Doesn't look like it:

http://www.microsoft.com/investor/EarningsAndFinancials/Fina...

The "Entertainment and Devices Division" is profitable, but contributes a negligible quantity to the overall profits.

And either way, the home game console is also a declining market.

Re: Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer to retire within 12 months

#140

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"While many called for his ouster for many years, I never saw a single leader emerge at Microsoft who could fill his shoes or the needs of this lofty position. Looking at the available options today, I still don't." This in and of itself is a failure of leadership. If you can't groom a leader to replace you in 15 years, that's a problem. Some could argue it's deliberate (defending their job) others might argue that h…

Not disagreeing, just clarifying. . .do you mean that the last 2 presidents and Bloomberg should have been/should be more involved in grooming folks within their respective parties to take their places?

Yes. Independent of your political stance, shouldn't Bush have groomed a few successors? You can see Obama's failure to groom the next generation when the top two candidates predate him by 20 years. NYC's mayor took a third term because there was no obvious candidate, and there's still not a good one.
Post reply on HN