Does Gravity Travel at the Speed of Light? (1998)
1–10 of 139 posts
Re: Does Gravity Travel at the Speed of Light? (1998)
#2Don't 'TL;DR' this is worth reading.
Re: Does Gravity Travel at the Speed of Light? (1998)
#3It's a fairly short and clear article, so no need for a Tl;DR. Note that this is NOT yet another "revolutionary" announcement, but just contemplative reasoning from a respected expert in gravitational physics.
Re: Does Gravity Travel at the Speed of Light? (1998)
#4Baez has published some great booklists and a FAQ for self study
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/index.html
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/books.html
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Administrivia/booklist...
Re: Does Gravity Travel at the Speed of Light? (1998)
#5I wonder if the recent nova event visible with the naked eye can be used to do an experimental measurement... or perhaps it has to be a supernova as the article suggests.
Re: Does Gravity Travel at the Speed of Light? (1998)
#6I wonder if the recent nova event visible with the naked eye can be used to do an experimental measurement... or perhaps it has to be a supernova as the article suggests.
I am guessing it has to be a supernova on account of there being many novae discovered/observed each year.
Re: Does Gravity Travel at the Speed of Light? (1998)
#7So, the FTL gravity pulses used in David Weber's Honorverse series (sci-fi space opera) aren't possible. :(
Re: Does Gravity Travel at the Speed of Light? (1998)
#8Something very interesting whenever this question is asked - what is the speed of light? It is "the speed at which data propagates through space time". I think that is a fascinating truth to our universe.
There is a very good discussion from r/askscience on this topic: http://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/1kjp6z/does_grav...
Re: Does Gravity Travel at the Speed of Light? (1998)
#9Date in title should be 2011 (date of latest revision), not 1998. Article includes a citation from after 1998.
Re: Does Gravity Travel at the Speed of Light? (1998)
#10I wonder if the recent nova event visible with the naked eye can be used to do an experimental measurement... or perhaps it has to be a supernova as the article suggests.
Yes, any gravitational radiation from a nova would be much weaker than from a supernova. As the article notes, unless the supernova is very close to us, our current detectors can't detect the gravitational waves from a supernova, so they certainly wouldn't be able to pick them up from a nova.