21–30 of 78 posts
Interesting, although I think the "beta" is quite literal. Seems to lack a bit of polish. The one I was most interested in was the Date Picker, but locks up Chrome (28) and Safari (6) on my machine. http://mozilla.github.io/brick/component/datepicker/demo/ind...
While the page does load, it has a long running script that dies :P
yeesh, I respect Mozilla for their true open-source-everything-all-the-time philosophy but this is an example where I think it backfires - it's too early! Even if these really are awesome components it's really hard to see past the lack of polish. People are fickle and you only get one chance to make a first impression, it's important that these things look good
I think the key is clarity in your communication, doing a lot of polish on top of unstable software and advertising it as stable causes people to waste time using it, advertising as beta / for early adopters lets the early adopters pick it up and the people who just want it to 'just work' can wait. If you lose a few people who dont understand the benefits still far outweight the negatives.
This is mostly just a disclaimer for people who are waiting to open source their software until 'its ready', its never ready, do it now.
yeesh, I respect Mozilla for their true open-source-everything-all-the-time philosophy but this is an example where I think it backfires - it's too early! Even if these really are awesome components it's really hard to see past the lack of polish. People are fickle and you only get one chance to make a first impression, it's important that these things look good
Doesn't work on my phone (Samsung Galaxy S3, Android Stock Browser).
Interesting, although I think the "beta" is quite literal. Seems to lack a bit of polish. The one I was most interested in was the Date Picker, but locks up Chrome (28) and Safari (6) on my machine. http://mozilla.github.io/brick/component/datepicker/demo/ind...
Am I being a too much of a purist or overlooking something here?
This is cool and certainly useful but I have concerns. Forgetting for a moment that this is a shim and imagining that all browsers support this natively, isn't this sort of thing outside the intended purpose of html. Html should describe content not styling and this sort of thing seems ripe for abuse. I thought XML was the markup language for describing custom data. Adding the ability to create your own DOM elements…
This is cool and certainly useful but I have concerns. Forgetting for a moment that this is a shim and imagining that all browsers support this natively, isn't this sort of thing outside the intended purpose of html. Html should describe content not styling and this sort of thing seems ripe for abuse. I thought XML was the markup language for describing custom data. Adding the ability to create your own DOM elements…
Not that it makes it right or wrong, but this just seems like a different take on the same (or similar) concepts.