Live data from Hacker News

Google Treks

google.com

111–114 of 114 posts

Re: Google Treks

#111
post #110
post #99

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, some scholars and some outliers. Judging from sales numbers, 90% of the population could not care less.

10% of people is still 600 million people. That's more than the number of scientifically literate people. Is science therefore irrelevant? Why are you bothering to make this point?

>10% of people is still 600 million people. That's more than the number of scientifically literate people. Is science therefore irrelevant? Why are you bothering to make this point?

You seem unable to grasp that something might be irrelevant TO most people (as in: they could not care less about it) and still relevant IN ITSELF.

Plus, science is a bad example, because it's totally unlike history or classical music. Someone not caring about science still comes into contact every day with products of science, they shape his life in major deegree, the economy he lives in, his health, his food, etc.

With classical music or history, people can forget about them and nothing happens to them (well, apart from them being less educated, but since most other people are too hardly anyone notices).

Re: Google Treks

#112
post #110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

10% of people is still 600 million people. That's more than the number of scientifically literate people. Is science therefore irrelevant? Why are you bothering to make this point?

> 10% of people is still 600 million people. That's more than the number of scientifically literate people. Is science therefore irrelevant? Why are you bothering to make this point? You seem unable to grasp that something might be irrelevant TO most people (as in: they could not care less about it) and still relevant IN ITSELF. Plus, science is a bad example, because it's totally unlike history or classical music. S…

Originally you said "Some scholars maybe." Then you backpedalled to "10% of people." A bit of a difference.

Everything you're saying now is obvious, which is why I asked why you're bothering to make this point. It seems like you're just being argumentative for no reason.

Re: Google Treks

#113

There are some great images here. I like how Google has been striving to document more beautiful places. The sheer amount of brainpower and processing that Google is putting into Streetview is truly staggering and unprecedented. Nobody else out there is doing it in this way. On a more hand-made note, my company, http://360cities.net , has been publishing user-generated 360º imagery since 2006. I have built a tour of…

Awesome! What do you think of combining 360º imagery with something like Oculus Rift to enable immersive travel experiences?

Re: Google Treks

#114
post #92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Scum"? Trying to raise the level of discourse are we?

If you're wondering why you're being downvoted, google the phrase. It's a well known joke.

My sarcasm meter must've been on the fritz at the time.
Post reply on HN