Live data from Hacker News

Hyperloop

spacex.com

91–100 of 983 posts

Re: Hyperloop

#91

No toilet, and no way to get off, or even really stand up? I know some personal jets lack such facilities, but they're not exactly open to the public. At least on BART you can move away from the crazy...

LA -> SF in 30 minutes. Why would you need a toilet?

Re: Hyperloop

#92

That capsule ( http://images.bwbx.io/cms/2013-08-12/0812_Hyperloop_605.jpg ) looks like a claustrophobic's nightmare. Otherwise very, very cool.

How is that any worse than standard commercial air travel? Plus, really, you are talking about a thirty-minute journey.

Re: Hyperloop

#93

The key advantages of a tube vs. a railway track are that it can be built above the ground on pylons and it can be built in prefabricated sections that are dropped in place and joined with an orbital seam welder. Did anyone else read this and imagine laser beams fired by satellites?

I did. It would be so cool :)

Re: Hyperloop

#94

The key advantages of a tube vs. a railway track are that it can be built above the ground on pylons and it can be built in prefabricated sections that are dropped in place and joined with an orbital seam welder. Did anyone else read this and imagine laser beams fired by satellites?

I did. It would be so cool :)

Re: Hyperloop

#95
post #63

"Hyperloop Passenger Capsule The maximum width is 4.43 ft (1.35 m) and maximum height is 6.11 ft (1.10 m). With rounded corners, this is equivalent to a 15 ft2 (1.4 m2) frontal area, not including any propulsion or suspension components." At a first look I didn't get that the proposed passenger capsule would be so small. That's pretty cramped. Edit: Isn't the the ft to m conversion for the height wrong?

Or pretty exclusive.

Re: Hyperloop

#96
post #84

> 4.5.6. Human Related Incidents Hyperloop would feature the same high level of security used at airports. However, the regular departure of Hyperloop capsules would result in a steadier and faster flow of passengers through security screening compared to airports. Ugh. That only seems feasible if back-scatter scanners are the only option (but would you still have to take your belt off and put all metal in a little b…

Wow, yeah, that basically ruins a significant part of the appeal to me.

Re: Hyperloop

#97

So, it's a two-lane highway where the cars are 5 miles apart? How many people will be able to use this thing?

"The Hyperloop is sized to allow expansion as the network becomes increasingly popular. The capacity would be 840 passengers per hour which more than sufficient to transport all of the 6 million passengers traveling between Los Angeles and San Francisco are as per year. In addition, this accounts for 70% of those travelers to use the Hyperloop during rush hour. The lower cost of traveling on Hyperloop is likely to result in increased demand, in which case the time between capsule departures could be significa ntly shortened."

p.11

Re: Hyperloop

#98
post #69

> Hyperloop is considered an open source transportation concept. I'm glad they didn't just let the idea die on a drawing board somewhere because of a lack of time/money. Now, someone has to just develop it faster than someone else can legislate against it.

Given the sort of heavy infrastructure required and their related permits, I'd assume that whoever actually starts an effort to build a HL-like system, will have local politicians on board.

These days, politicians have to stay bought. And any competitor or detractor can derail your effort by buying off one of the local politicos.

This is one of the biggest reasons northern CA doesn't already have a bunch of such systems already in place.

Re: Hyperloop

#99
I'm impressed, but I'm afraid Hyperloop's operation is modeled after airplanes, while the actual use of the system would be closer to a city bus.

>All capsules would have direct radio contact with station operators in case of emergencies, allowing passengers to report any incident, to request help and to receive assistance. In addition, all capsules would be fitted with first aid equipment

>Typical times between an emergency and access to a physician should be shorter than if an incident happened during airplane takeoff. In the case of the airplane, the route would need to be adjusted, other planes rerouted, runways cleared, airplane landed, taxi to a gate, and doors opened. An emergency in a Hyperloop capsule simply requires the system to complete the planned journey and meet emergency personnel at the destination.

What happens if a brawl erupts inside a capsule? What happens if a suicide bomber boards the Hyperloop?

Re: Hyperloop

#100
My dad has worked on at least one proposal for linear rail in California in the past. Emailed him the whitepaper for comments. Delivery not guaranteed :)
Post reply on HN