Live data from Hacker News

Split Tunneling on Cisco IPSec VPN

shadabahmed.com

1–4 of 4 posts

Re: Split Tunneling on Cisco IPSec VPN

#2
Cisco IPSec endpoints are more than capable of split horizon (split-DNS too) without having to bodge it on the client side.

If it isn't configured then netsec doesn't want split horizon. There is likely a company policy that if you are attached to their network, you are only attached to their network.

Re: Split Tunneling on Cisco IPSec VPN

#3

Cisco IPSec endpoints are more than capable of split horizon (split-DNS too) without having to bodge it on the client side. If it isn't configured then netsec doesn't want split horizon. There is likely a company policy that if you are attached to their network, you are only attached to their network.

Yes, this is a company policy. The method just a way to subvert that

Re: Split Tunneling on Cisco IPSec VPN

#4

Cisco IPSec endpoints are more than capable of split horizon (split-DNS too) without having to bodge it on the client side. If it isn't configured then netsec doesn't want split horizon. There is likely a company policy that if you are attached to their network, you are only attached to their network.

Yes, this is a company policy. The method just a way to subvert that

And if it's worth its salt will disconnect you once it sees the routing change.