Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're completely right. This discussion is almost impossible since, for the human brain, I can't define "knowledge", "capacity", "limit", "intellect". I mean really, what does it mean for a human brain to reach capacity anyway? What function is it not able to do once it reaches that point? What does it mean to be smart or intellectual? Do we all agree that Stephen Hawking is those things? Why? I don't know and I can…
> I don't know and I can't even begin to debate it, I'm not smart enough. Well, no. You lack the knowledge for having a useful discussion about it. Spend time brushing up on pedagogical techniques, neuroscience, cognitive science, psychology: all the fields that touch on growth in the mental dimensions of a human being. My own expertise is pretty minimal, but just seeing the cutting edge of the research is fascinatin…
NSA revelations could hurt collaboration with 'betrayed' hackers
101–106 of 106 posts
Re: NSA revelations could hurt collaboration with 'betrayed' hackers
#102With also Binney, Drake, Snowden, with the Justice Dept's Eric Holder and Carmen Ortiz prosecuting with trump upped draconian charges, and that we also know the intel/security agencies spokespeople with an eagle logo are consistent prevaricators, it is clearly recklessly dangerous to become directly involved with these federally sanctioned criminals. At least factor that in, while negotiating your compensation.
Re: NSA revelations could hurt collaboration with 'betrayed' hackers
#103The most dangerous and stupid meme percolating in pop tech culture is that the people engaged with tech culture have a unique claim to computer science, electrical engineering, cryptography, information security, and privacy technology. The Slashdot diaspora genuinely believes that most of the world's computer engineering talent reads their comments. The reality is that not only does money do a fine job of buying tal…
Re: NSA revelations could hurt collaboration with 'betrayed' hackers
#104The most dangerous and stupid meme percolating in pop tech culture is that the people engaged with tech culture have a unique claim to computer science, electrical engineering, cryptography, information security, and privacy technology. The Slashdot diaspora genuinely believes that most of the world's computer engineering talent reads their comments. The reality is that not only does money do a fine job of buying tal…
Maybe the NSA is different but from my experience, the big contractors that do programming for government programs are exactly the same. Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics, etc- they have lots of mediocre .NET and J2EE devs.
Those types of developers you can attract with money. But the truly bright and intelligent people just aren't interested.
Re: NSA revelations could hurt collaboration with 'betrayed' hackers
#105It's worth pointing out that you don't need to work "for the NSA" to be contributing to state surveillance. If someone is hired straight out of college to work for any type of cloud services provider with revenues over a billion, it's probably safe to say that they your prospective employer has enough market reach to have attracted the attention of state surveillance programs. Of course, by law, your prospective empl…
> It's worth pointing out that you don't need to work "for the NSA" to be contributing to state surveillance. The flip is also true: you're not necessarily contributing to state surveillance just because you work "for the NSA". Two easy examples are SELinux and the various NSA Guides to Securing .
Re: NSA revelations could hurt collaboration with 'betrayed' hackers
#106"it's significant that the NSA's massive XKeyscore program runs on a Linux cluster." Is there an option in Creative Commons or GPL to exclude government use?