Hey Junto, I suggest you put a date on the post, something like "Aug 09th, 2015", so people can understand more easily it's a fictitious post. But the idea is awesome! I hope it can get to Marissa or some other visionary executive/entrepreneur to make something like this a reality in the years to come.
Ha - yeah. I had a wtf! moment and started searching online. Turns out there IS a Yahoo OMS
You realise that this post speaks about 2013 as it would be in the past, right?
Oops. Where is that, I can't find it?
Hm, I'm confused now - maybe my sentence wasn't clear enough.
What I wanted to say is wether he realises that the blogpost was written in the future (2 years from now)..
Serious question: Could they build their IT center on big boats like casinos? Sure, the traffic would still go through US, but that can be encrypted (with something better than SSL).
How do you power the data centre?
A low latency uplink without a single point of failure is another major problem too.
If anybody develops a truly secure messaging system, free from NSA's snooping, it won't be Yahoo. Simply because Yahoo is US based and can be secretly forced to change the code or push a hidden update that will decrypt everything. And by the way, such systems already exist 1) https://crypto.cat (after a few bad releases it looks like they got it right... probably) 2) https://github.com/ChatSecure for iOS There are a…
Serious question: Could they build their IT center on big boats like casinos? Sure, the traffic would still go through US, but that can be encrypted (with something better than SSL).
Sure they could.
They could also spend billions buying every block of lego to create a Yahoo logo visible from space. Which makes about as much sense as introducing significant legal risks to their business all for a few thousand new email accounts.
If anybody develops a truly secure messaging system, free from NSA's snooping, it won't be Yahoo. Simply because Yahoo is US based and can be secretly forced to change the code or push a hidden update that will decrypt everything. And by the way, such systems already exist 1) https://crypto.cat (after a few bad releases it looks like they got it right... probably) 2) https://github.com/ChatSecure for iOS There are a…
That's why it would need to be open source and available for any security researcher to go looking around. The reason I chose Yahoo, was that they have the marketing clout and the brand to pull this off. This needs to be something that really replaces email, and kicks in into obscurity. Otherwise it is just another hacker tool used by a minority of privacy conscious geeks like us.
Most people won't bother compiling from open source.
We need a trusted company outside of jurisdiction of all these insane new laws.
> The replacement had to be open source, secure, no metadata leakage and as easy to use as email is today.
This actually sounds a lot like BitMessage [0], although it's not completely trivial to setup, since you have to setup a not so user friendly address and such.
Serious question: Could they build their IT center on big boats like casinos? Sure, the traffic would still go through US, but that can be encrypted (with something better than SSL).
This is silly. If I'm a shareholder in Y!, I don't want them wasting time/money on something like this right now. Honestly, the majority of the population doesn't care about the government email tracking or what-have-you. A very vocal minority seems to care, for now, but your average accountant / builder probably didn't spend 5 minutes caring. If Y! did do something like this, I doubt it would last--just not enough p…
Right now the publicity--the "Yahoo! is doing something new and interesting and helpful" is exactly what I'd want to see as a shareholder. And as an employee. And as someone with a Yahoo! login. Keep in mind that Yahoo's old enemy at this point is the idea that they are doing nothing new, nothing interesting. This feeling is what necessitates the acqui-hires and leads to new CEOs and low stock prices.
This is silly. If I'm a shareholder in Y!, I don't want them wasting time/money on something like this right now. Honestly, the majority of the population doesn't care about the government email tracking or what-have-you. A very vocal minority seems to care, for now, but your average accountant / builder probably didn't spend 5 minutes caring. If Y! did do something like this, I doubt it would last--just not enough p…
You are right. General population doesn't care. But the vocal minority includes some of the best minds in engineering. Yahoo gain's their respect. Some of them will join Yahoo and go on to make products for the general population. I'm a shareholder and I like this move.